Public health · 2025
Using theory-informed, arts-based research translation to change community attitudes towards people who inject drugs newly released from prison: A randomised controlled trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Broady Timothy R, Drysdale Kerryn, Brener Loren, Schroeder Sophia, Marshall Alison D, Lafferty Lise, Higgs Peter, Baldry Eileen, Dietze Paul, Stoove Mark, Treloar Carla
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Community attitudes contribute to social exclusion of people with incarceration and injecting drug use histories. Interventions that positively impact community attitudes can strengthen efforts to reduce recidivism and support positive outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the impact of such interventions on public perceptions towards people who inject drugs newly released from prison.
STUDY DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial.
METHOD: A narrative script on the theme of "exhaustion" was produced from an interview study of post-release experiences. Members of the public participated in a three-armed randomised controlled trial: (1) control; (2) neutral intervention (plain English description); (3) narrative intervention (scripted performance). Surveys administered at baseline, post-intervention, and three-month follow-up measured perceptions of the target group through four key dimensions of stigma. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 24 participants to further investigate responses to the narrative intervention.
RESULTS: 1071 participants completed all phases of the trial. Post-intervention scores indicated more positive perceptions among participants in the neutral and narrative intervention arms than the control arm. Effects were mostly more positive for the narrative intervention arm. At follow-up, scores for the neutral intervention arm indicated more positive perceptions than the control arm on the Opinions scale, while the narrative intervention arm recorded more positive perceptions than the control arm on both Opinions and Attitudes scales. Interviews indicated that participants who were not influenced by the narrative intervention believed that people who inject drugs should be held accountable for not controlling their drug use.
CONCLUSION: Research-informed, co-designed, arts-based interventions can positively impact public perceptions of a highly stigmatised group. Effects of the interventions attenuated over time, suggesting a need for further interventions focusing on perceptions of controllability of drug use.
STUDY DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial.
METHOD: A narrative script on the theme of "exhaustion" was produced from an interview study of post-release experiences. Members of the public participated in a three-armed randomised controlled trial: (1) control; (2) neutral intervention (plain English description); (3) narrative intervention (scripted performance). Surveys administered at baseline, post-intervention, and three-month follow-up measured perceptions of the target group through four key dimensions of stigma. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 24 participants to further investigate responses to the narrative intervention.
RESULTS: 1071 participants completed all phases of the trial. Post-intervention scores indicated more positive perceptions among participants in the neutral and narrative intervention arms than the control arm. Effects were mostly more positive for the narrative intervention arm. At follow-up, scores for the neutral intervention arm indicated more positive perceptions than the control arm on the Opinions scale, while the narrative intervention arm recorded more positive perceptions than the control arm on both Opinions and Attitudes scales. Interviews indicated that participants who were not influenced by the narrative intervention believed that people who inject drugs should be held accountable for not controlling their drug use.
CONCLUSION: Research-informed, co-designed, arts-based interventions can positively impact public perceptions of a highly stigmatised group. Effects of the interventions attenuated over time, suggesting a need for further interventions focusing on perceptions of controllability of drug use.