MedElevator
Войти в исследования Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024
Indications for treatment of incidental obturator hernia encountered during transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP).
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nakamura Akihiro, Harada Yoshikuni, Oyama Hideyuki, Tadamura Kaori, Moro Hiroshi, Kigawa Gaku, Umemoto Takahiro, Matsuo Kenichi, Tanaka Kuniya
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To clarify indications for treating incidental obturator hernia (IOH) detected during laparoscopic groin hernia repair by comparing features of IOH with obturator hernia (OH) complicated by incarceration.
METHODS: Twenty patients who underwent laparoscopic OH repair between January 2017 and July 2024 were included in this retrospective study. They were divided into groups with incarceration or a past history of incarceration (the OH group) or without incarceration (the IOH group). Univariate analysis was performed, and ROC curves were constructed with the cut-off values representing indications for treating IOH.
RESULTS: Thirteen patients comprised the IOH group (bilateral in one), while seven comprised the OH group (all unilateral). Univariate analysis selected high age, low body mass index (BMI), and a large orifice as risk factors for incarceration. Cut-off values of these variables were age 89 years (area under curve, 0.816), BMI 17.7 kg/m2 (0.939), and orifice diameter 12 mm (0.796). Age of at least 89 years and BMI of 18 or less were more common in the incarceration group (P = 0.004, P = 0.007), and all patients in the incarceration group had orifices at least 12 mm in diameter. Assigning the 3 variables 1 point each, the OH group had significantly higher scores of at least 2 points (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: High age, low BMI, and large orifice diameter may be considered useful indicators for treating IOH. Two or more of these factors could place a patient at high risk for incarceration and show need for treatment of IOH.
METHODS: Twenty patients who underwent laparoscopic OH repair between January 2017 and July 2024 were included in this retrospective study. They were divided into groups with incarceration or a past history of incarceration (the OH group) or without incarceration (the IOH group). Univariate analysis was performed, and ROC curves were constructed with the cut-off values representing indications for treating IOH.
RESULTS: Thirteen patients comprised the IOH group (bilateral in one), while seven comprised the OH group (all unilateral). Univariate analysis selected high age, low body mass index (BMI), and a large orifice as risk factors for incarceration. Cut-off values of these variables were age 89 years (area under curve, 0.816), BMI 17.7 kg/m2 (0.939), and orifice diameter 12 mm (0.796). Age of at least 89 years and BMI of 18 or less were more common in the incarceration group (P = 0.004, P = 0.007), and all patients in the incarceration group had orifices at least 12 mm in diameter. Assigning the 3 variables 1 point each, the OH group had significantly higher scores of at least 2 points (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: High age, low BMI, and large orifice diameter may be considered useful indicators for treating IOH. Two or more of these factors could place a patient at high risk for incarceration and show need for treatment of IOH.