MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1089/jchc.23.10.0087

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care · 2024

The Nutritional Content of Food in Carceral Institutions: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies.

LeBlanc Caroline P, Johnson Claire, Goguen Pierre, Gagnon Samuel

Систематический обзорСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The nutritional content of food in carceral institutions is important because it influences weight gain and health during incarceration. This systematic review assessed the available quantitative data and nutritional analyses of food in carceral institutions. Methodology is based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement with four phases (identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion). Nine articles were selected. Most carceral institutions provided adequate nutrition for micronutrients, except for vitamin D (inadequate) and sodium (excessive). Most menus followed recommendations for macronutrients. Food from the commissary stores is high in calories, sugar, fat, and sodium. Most menus are adequate according to Dietary Reference Intakes. Changing menus drastically to meet nutritional targets may lead to consuming more food from commissary, potentially leading to poorer eating. For some menus, minor adjustments could bring the nutritional content closer to recommendations.

Для цитирования: LeBlanc Caroline P, Johnson Claire, Goguen Pierre, Gagnon Samuel. The Nutritional Content of Food in Carceral Institutions: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies.. Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care. 2024. DOI: 10.1089/jchc.23.10.0087.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.