International journal of obstetric anesthesia · 2017
The influence of fluid management on outcomes in preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pretorius T, van Rensburg G, Dyer R A, Biccard B M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The optimal fluid management strategy to ensure best outcomes in preeclamptic patients remains a controversial issue, with little evidence to support any one approach.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the effect of various fluid management strategies on clinical outcomes, haemodynamic indices and biochemical markers in preeclamptic women and their babies. Primary outcome measures were the occurrence of pulmonary oedema and/or the development of renal impairment.
METHODS: A systematic review of randomised fluid management strategies was conducted. Five electronic databases were searched using the expanded search terms: 'intravenous fluid', 'plasma substitutes', 'intravenous fluid management', 'intravenous fluid therapy', plasma volume expansion', 'fluid restriction', 'oncotic therapy', 'crystalloids', 'colloids', 'preeclampsia', 'toxemia of pregnancy', 'pregnancy-induced hypertension', 'eclampsia' and 'gestational proteinuric hypertension'.
RESULTS: Six randomised controlled trials (RCTs), from nine publications, were included in the final analysis. There were no differences between groups with respect to the incidence of pulmonary oedema, perinatal mortality, preterm delivery and caesarean section. Colloid volume expansion was associated with a significantly lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure, but had no effect on heart rate or cardiac index. Data on systemic vascular resistance (SVR), serum atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and urine volume could not be aggregated.
CONCLUSION: Data on the ideal fluid strategy in women with preeclampsia is limited, and insufficient to make any strong recommendations. Further randomised controlled studies are needed to provide more evidence for which fluid management strategies are best suited to this heterogeneous patient group.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the effect of various fluid management strategies on clinical outcomes, haemodynamic indices and biochemical markers in preeclamptic women and their babies. Primary outcome measures were the occurrence of pulmonary oedema and/or the development of renal impairment.
METHODS: A systematic review of randomised fluid management strategies was conducted. Five electronic databases were searched using the expanded search terms: 'intravenous fluid', 'plasma substitutes', 'intravenous fluid management', 'intravenous fluid therapy', plasma volume expansion', 'fluid restriction', 'oncotic therapy', 'crystalloids', 'colloids', 'preeclampsia', 'toxemia of pregnancy', 'pregnancy-induced hypertension', 'eclampsia' and 'gestational proteinuric hypertension'.
RESULTS: Six randomised controlled trials (RCTs), from nine publications, were included in the final analysis. There were no differences between groups with respect to the incidence of pulmonary oedema, perinatal mortality, preterm delivery and caesarean section. Colloid volume expansion was associated with a significantly lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure, but had no effect on heart rate or cardiac index. Data on systemic vascular resistance (SVR), serum atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and urine volume could not be aggregated.
CONCLUSION: Data on the ideal fluid strategy in women with preeclampsia is limited, and insufficient to make any strong recommendations. Further randomised controlled studies are needed to provide more evidence for which fluid management strategies are best suited to this heterogeneous patient group.