MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00134-014-3576-1

Медицинская библиотека · Intensive care medicine · 2014

Volume expansion in the first 4 days of shock: a prospective multicentre study in 19 French intensive care units.

Boulain Thierry, Boisrame-Helms Julie, Ehrmann Stephan, Lascarrou Jean-Baptiste, Bouglé Adrien, Chiche Arnaud, Lakhal Karim, Gaudry Stéphane, Perbet Sébastien, Desachy Arnaud, Cabasson Séverin, Geneau Isabelle, Courouble Patricia, Clavieras Noémie, Massanet Pablo L, Bellec Frédéric, Falquet Yoan, Réminiac François, Vignon Philippe, Dequin Pierre-François, Meziani Ferhat

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To describe the current practices of volume expansion in French intensive care units (ICU).

METHODS

In 19 ICUs, we prospectively observed the prescription and monitoring practices of volume expansion in consecutive adult patients with shock [sustained hypotension and/or need of vasopressor therapy, associated with at least tachycardia and/or sign (s) of hypoperfusion]. Patients were included at the time of prescription of the first fluid bolus (FB). Thereafter, all the FBs administered during the 96 h following shock onset were surveyed. An FB was defined as an intravenous bolus of at least 100 ml of a blood volume expander intended to rapidly improve the patient's circulatory condition.

RESULTS

We included 777 patients [age: 63 ± 15 years; female gender: 274 (35 %); simplified acute physiology score II: 55.9 ± 20.6; ICU length of stay: 6 days (interquartile range (IQR) 3-13); ICU mortality: 32.8 %] and surveyed 2,694 FBs. At enrolment mean arterial pressure was 63 mmHg (IQR 55-71). The most frequent triggers of FB were hypotension, low urine output, tachycardia, skin mottling and hyperlactataemia. Amount of fluid given at each FB was highly variable between centres. Crystalloids were used in 91 % (2,394/2,635) and synthetic colloids in 3.3 % (87/2,635) of FBs. Overall, clinicians used any kind of haemodynamic assessment (central venous pressure measurement, predictive indices of fluid responsiveness, echocardiography, cardiac output monitoring or a combination of these) in 23.6 % (635/2,694) of all FBs surveyed, with an important between-centre heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

High between-centre variability characterised all the aspects of FB prescription and monitoring, but overall haemodynamic exploration to help guide and monitor FB was infrequent.

Для цитирования: Boulain Thierry, Boisrame-Helms Julie, Ehrmann Stephan, Lascarrou Jean-Baptiste, Bouglé Adrien, Chiche Arnaud, Lakhal Karim, Gaudry Stéphane, Perbet Sébastien, Desachy Arnaud, Cabasson Séverin, Geneau Isabelle, Courouble Patricia, Clavieras Noémie, Massanet Pablo L, Bellec Frédéric, Falquet Yoan, Réminiac François, Vignon Philippe, Dequin Pierre-François, Meziani Ferhat. Volume expansion in the first 4 days of shock: a prospective multicentre study in 19 French intensive care units.. Intensive care medicine. 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-014-3576-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.