m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia · 2011

Detection of right ventricular insufficiency and guidance of volume therapy are facilitated by simultaneous monitoring of static and functional preload parameters.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Richter Hans Peter, Petersen Christian, Goetz Alwin E, Reuter Daniel A, Kubitz Jens C

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE: Acute right ventricular failure (RVF) is a life-threatening condition. This study investigated whether the combination of central venous pressure (CVP) and left ventricular functional preload parameters, such as stroke volume variation (SVV) and pulse pressure variation (PPV), can be used for the detection of acute RVF and for guidance of volume therapy.

DESIGN AND SETTING: Experimental study in a university laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen anesthetized and ventilated pigs.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: For the induction of RVF, mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP) was increased by 50% with a continuous infusion of a thromboxane-A(2) analog (U46619). Then, blood removal (300 mL) and retransfusion (blood 200 mL + colloid solution 200 mL) were performed. An analysis of volume responders and nonresponders was implemented. Increasing MPAP (25.1 to 37.4 mmHg) led to decreases in mean arterial pressure (72.2 to 60.1 mmHg) and cardiac output (2.8 to 2.3 L/min, p < 0.05). CVP (11.3 to 12.6 mmHg), PPV (13% to 17%), and SVV (11 to 14%) increased significantly (p < 0.05). During volume removal, MPAP (37.4 to 34.1 mmHg), mean arterial pressure (60.1 to 53.2 mmHg), and cardiac output (2.3 to 2.1 L/min) decreased (p < 0.05), whereas PPV and SVV remained unchanged. During volume loading, CVP increased in volume responders and nonresponders; however, PPV decreased in responders only.

CONCLUSIONS: Increases of CVP and SVV or PPV are suspicious for RVF. However, SVV and PPV fail to predict volume responsiveness in RVF. Changes in SVV and PPV during a volume-loading maneuver can be used to assess volume responsiveness.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты