Transfusion · 2011
Red blood cell preservation by droplet freezing with polyvinylpyrrolidone or sucrose-dextrose and by bulk freezing with glycerol.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schmid Pirmin, Huvard Michael J, Lee-Stroka A Hallie, Lee Jae Y, Byrne Karen M, Flegel Willy A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Red blood cell (RBC) preservation is essential to transfusion medicine. Many blood group reference laboratories need a method to preserve rare blood samples for serologic testing at a later date. This study offers a comparison of three common cryoprotective agents and protocols used today: bulk preservation with glycerol and droplet freezing with sucrose-dextrose (S+D) or polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP).
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Human blood from 14 volunteers was collected and frozen at set intervals over 2 weeks with PVP, S+D, or glycerol. The frozen RBCs were later thawed and the percentage of surviving RBCs was determined. Detailed protocols and an instructional video are supplied.
RESULTS: Over a 2-week period, RBCs preserved with glycerol and thawed with a widely used protocol showed a recovery of 41 ± 16% (mean ± standard deviation) while those thawed with a modified glycerol protocol showed a recovery of 76 ± 8%. RBCs preserved by droplet freezing with S+D showed a recovery of 56 ± 11% while those preserved by droplet freezing with PVP showed a recovery of 85 ± 6%. Recovery values were similar with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid or heparin anticoagulants, differing freezing rates, and varying droplet volumes.
CONCLUSION: Droplet freezing with PVP offered the greatest recovery. While bulk freezing with glycerol can also be effective, droplet freezing may be a more convenient method overall. It requires less effort to thaw, needs much less storage room, and allows blood group laboratories to be frugal with thawing rare samples.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Human blood from 14 volunteers was collected and frozen at set intervals over 2 weeks with PVP, S+D, or glycerol. The frozen RBCs were later thawed and the percentage of surviving RBCs was determined. Detailed protocols and an instructional video are supplied.
RESULTS: Over a 2-week period, RBCs preserved with glycerol and thawed with a widely used protocol showed a recovery of 41 ± 16% (mean ± standard deviation) while those thawed with a modified glycerol protocol showed a recovery of 76 ± 8%. RBCs preserved by droplet freezing with S+D showed a recovery of 56 ± 11% while those preserved by droplet freezing with PVP showed a recovery of 85 ± 6%. Recovery values were similar with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid or heparin anticoagulants, differing freezing rates, and varying droplet volumes.
CONCLUSION: Droplet freezing with PVP offered the greatest recovery. While bulk freezing with glycerol can also be effective, droplet freezing may be a more convenient method overall. It requires less effort to thaw, needs much less storage room, and allows blood group laboratories to be frugal with thawing rare samples.