Experimental lung research · 2010
Pulmonary effects of positive end-expiratory pressure and fluid therapy in experimental lung injury.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kredel Markus, Muellenbach Ralf M, Schlegel Nicolas, Wunder Christian, Klingelhöfer Michael, Lange Markus, Roewer Norbert, Waschke Jens, Brederlau Jörg
Аннотация
The separate effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and intravascular volume administration on the histopathologic lung injury were not investigated in experimental lung injury previously. The authors hypothesized that high PEEP and a restrictive volume therapy would yield the best oxygenation and the least degree of lung injury. Pigs (52.8 ± 3.4 kg) underwent saline lavage-induced lung injury. The animals were ventilated either with low PEEP (mean PEEP 9 to 12 cm H₂O) and liberal volume therapy using hydroxyethyl starch (LowP/Vol+) or high PEEP (mean PEEP 21 cm H₂O) combined with recruitment maneuvers and liberal (HighP/Vol+) or restrictive volume therapy (HighP/Vol-). After 6.5 hours, lung injury was determined by using a histopathologic score evaluating overdistension, edema, exsudation, and inflammation. When volume therapy was liberal, high PEEP (HighP/Vol+) improved the Pao₂/Fio₂ index (416 ± 80 mm Hg) compared to low PEEP (LowP/Vol+, 189 ± 55 mm Hg; P < .05) but there was no difference in the median (interquartile range) lung injury score: 1.6 (1.2-1.9) and 1.9 (1.4-2.0). High PEEP with restrictive volume therapy (HighP/Vol-) did not further improve oxygenation (400 ± 55 mm Hg) but ameliorated the degree of lung injury: 0.9 (0.8-1.4) (P < .05). In lavage-induced lung injury, high PEEP improved oxygenation, but restrictive volume administration markedly reduced the lung injury score, mainly by reduced edema.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AnimalsCombined Modality TherapyDisease Models, AnimalFemaleFluid TherapyHemodynamicsHydroxyethyl Starch DerivativesLungLung ComplianceLung InjuryPlasma SubstitutesPneumoniaPositive-Pressure RespirationPressurePulmonary EdemaRespiratory MechanicsRespiratory RateSeverity of Illness IndexSodium ChlorideSwineTime Factors