International journal of prisoner health · 2020
A failed success: the Barlinnie Special Unit.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wilson David, Brookes Michael
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This paper aims to explore the reasons for and the subsequent longer-term impact of the closure of the Barlinnie Special Unit (BSU).
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The paper is both descriptive, providing an overview of the work of the BSU, and conceptual in that it argues that the limits of "prisoner rehabilitation" are observed in the closure of the BSU, which sounds a warning for other penal therapeutic communities and what it means to operate effectively.
FINDINGS: The BSU which assisted long-term, difficult and violent prisoners moderate their prison behaviour and then to live non-offending lives, lost the confidence of government ministers and officials, as well as senior prison managers and, seemingly, the public, so closed after being in operation for 21 years. The impact of this has been that the Scottish Prison Service has not introduced, or attempted to introduce, a similar regime for managing and treating violent and disruptive prisoners.
PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: There are important lessons to be learned from the BSU experience for all who manage and work in specialist, prison therapeutic units or within prison therapeutic regimes. This includes balancing the therapeutic elements of the regime, which may involve engaging in practices which are outside the norm for custodial establishments, with those establishments' security and operational requirements, so as to not to create a disconnect between addressing offending behaviour and maintaining expected standards of wider prison conduct.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: While there have been previous evaluations of the BSU, the longer-term impact has neither been previously considered and nor has the unit's closure been considered from a penal philosophical perspective.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The paper is both descriptive, providing an overview of the work of the BSU, and conceptual in that it argues that the limits of "prisoner rehabilitation" are observed in the closure of the BSU, which sounds a warning for other penal therapeutic communities and what it means to operate effectively.
FINDINGS: The BSU which assisted long-term, difficult and violent prisoners moderate their prison behaviour and then to live non-offending lives, lost the confidence of government ministers and officials, as well as senior prison managers and, seemingly, the public, so closed after being in operation for 21 years. The impact of this has been that the Scottish Prison Service has not introduced, or attempted to introduce, a similar regime for managing and treating violent and disruptive prisoners.
PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: There are important lessons to be learned from the BSU experience for all who manage and work in specialist, prison therapeutic units or within prison therapeutic regimes. This includes balancing the therapeutic elements of the regime, which may involve engaging in practices which are outside the norm for custodial establishments, with those establishments' security and operational requirements, so as to not to create a disconnect between addressing offending behaviour and maintaining expected standards of wider prison conduct.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: While there have been previous evaluations of the BSU, the longer-term impact has neither been previously considered and nor has the unit's closure been considered from a penal philosophical perspective.