MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/phn.12622

Медицинская библиотека · Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.) · 2019

A qualitative assessment of a dog program for youth offenders in an adult prison.

Smith Hayden P, Smith Holly

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Dog programs occurring in prison tend to generate positive public opinion and media portrayals, yet they often lack empirical validation. This is the first study to examine the key themes that drive a dog program aimed at incarcerated youth serving time in an adult prison.

DESIGN AND SAMPLE: A sample of male youth (n = 31) were provided survey questions on a rescue dog program. A grounded qualitative approach was employed with open-ended responses.

RESULTS

The following themes emerged: the symbolism of the dog its role in therapy, perceptions of positive behaviors and rehabilitation, a sense of normality, and universal support by inmates.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the potential for utilizing rescue dogs in therapeutic interventions in which the vulnerable inmate can discuss early trauma, interpersonal dysfunction and histories of deviance. The dog symbolized the potential for incarcerated youth to engage in discussion of sensitive topics in a safe manner. Policy implications also include the function of dogs in creating a normalizing effect on the prison unit itself, one that can promote rehabilitation. There was universal support for the program which is rare in the prison milieu. Theoretically, positive outcomes occurred in an indirect manner, though more research is needed.

Для цитирования: Smith Hayden P, Smith Holly. A qualitative assessment of a dog program for youth offenders in an adult prison.. Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.). 2019. DOI: 10.1111/phn.12622.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.