MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10597-017-0083-1

Медицинская библиотека · Community mental health journal · 2017

Clinical Factors Associated with Successful Discharge from Assertive Community Treatment.

Bromley Elizabeth, Mikesell Lisa, Whelan Fiona, Hellemann Gerhard, Hunt Marcia, Cuddeback Gary, Bradford Daniel W, Young Alexander S

СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We sought to explore clinical factors associated with successful transition from Assertive Community Treatment to less intensive clinical services. Mixed-method observational follow up study of veterans discharged from three VA-affiliated ACT teams to less intensive clinical services. Of the 240 veterans in ACT, 9% (n = 21) were discharged during the study period. Among the 11 of 21 discharged veterans who enrolled in the follow up study, reason for discharge, designated by the veteran's primary clinician at the time of discharge, predicted outcomes (p = 0.02) at 9 months, with "disengagement" as a reason for discharge predicting poorer outcomes. Six of 11 veterans experienced poor outcomes at 9 months, including incarceration and substance use relapse. ACT clinicians rarely discharge clients. Many clients may experience negative clinical events following ACT discharge, and clients may be difficult to follow post-discharge. Client disengagement from ACT may indicate higher likelihood of poor outcomes following discharge to less intensive clinical services.

Для цитирования: Bromley Elizabeth, Mikesell Lisa, Whelan Fiona, Hellemann Gerhard, Hunt Marcia, Cuddeback Gary, Bradford Daniel W, Young Alexander S. Clinical Factors Associated with Successful Discharge from Assertive Community Treatment.. Community mental health journal. 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s10597-017-0083-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.