MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/00015458.2016.1229400

Медицинская библиотека · Acta chirurgica Belgica · 2016

Complicated inguino-scrotal bladder hernia: a case of two-step repair.

François Jules, Defoort Barbara, Muysoms Filip

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Inguino-scrotal sliding hernia of the bladder (IBH) is a rare condition. Frequently, it is asymptomatic but sometimes it can be complicated by urosepsis and incarceration.

CASE PRESENTATION: A 74-year-old male with an IBH was admitted to the intensive care unit with urosepsis, acute renal insufficiency and incarceration of the herniated bladder. A two-step approach was performed to repair this complicated hernia. Firstly, the incarcerated bladder was reduced during a laparoscopic, trans-abdominal approach. Ten days later - after treatment of the urosepsis with antibiotics and normalisation of the inflammatory parameters - a Lichtenstein hernia repair was completed. The laparoscopic approach allowed correcting the acute incarceration of the bladder with possibility to inspect the bladder for iatrogenic bladder perforation. And after treating the urosepsis with adequate antibiotics, the second step was performed through an open Lichtenstein hernia repair, thus minimising the risk of mesh infection.

CONCLUSION

In case of an IBH, complicated by urosepsis, a laparoscopic reduction of the herniated bladder followed by a Lichtenstein hernia repair in a second time is a valid option.

Для цитирования: François Jules, Defoort Barbara, Muysoms Filip. Complicated inguino-scrotal bladder hernia: a case of two-step repair.. Acta chirurgica Belgica. 2016. DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2016.1229400.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.