MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ijscr.2015.12.022

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of surgery case reports · 2015

Primary peritoneal adenocarcinoma as content of an incarcerated umbilical hernia: A case-report and review of the literature.

Varga-Szabó D, Papadakis M, Pröpper S, Zirngibl H

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Umbilical hernia is a common finding in many cases, posing potentially life-threatening complications, such as incarceration or strangulation. The presence of malignancy in hernia sacs is, however, rather rare.

PRESENTATION OF CASE: Here we report on a case of primary peritoneal adenocarcinoma found through histological examination of omental tissue, resected due to an incarcerated umbilical hernia of an 84-years-old woman. There was no macroscopic sign of malignancy during operation; only after routine examination of histological sections the diagnosis was found.

DISCUSSION: To our knowledge this is the first report of primary peritoneal cancer as content of an umbilical hernia. This is a rare neoplasm and histologically identical to epithelial ovarian carcinoma. For this reason, the diagnosis is usually based on the histological finding and exclusion of a primary ovarian tumor. Primary peritoneal cancer has a poor outcome in general. Early diagnosis is, therefore, essential for effective treatment.

CONCLUSION

Histological analysis of resected hernia sac or content should be performed routinely to discover malignant diseases in the background of a hernia.

Для цитирования: Varga-Szabó D, Papadakis M, Pröpper S, Zirngibl H. Primary peritoneal adenocarcinoma as content of an incarcerated umbilical hernia: A case-report and review of the literature.. International journal of surgery case reports. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2015.12.022.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.