Rambam Maimonides medical journal · 2026
Fetal Pain: Neurobiology, Clinical Practice, and Compassionate Care-A Narrative Review.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dominsky Omri, Solt Ido
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Whether a fetus can experience pain remains scientifically and clinically contested, particularly as invasive fetal procedures become more common.
OBJECTIVES: To review fetal nociceptive development, the evidence and uncertainties relevant to pain perception, and the clinical rationale for fetal analgesia during invasive procedures.
METHODS: We performed a targeted narrative search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library, reference lists, and professional society websites. The final synthesis comprised 34 core sources.
RESULTS: Functional nociceptive and neuroendocrine responses to noxious stimuli are documented from the mid-second trimester and can be attenuated by fetal opioids. Early thalamic and subplate circuitry may challenge the claim that mature cortical architecture is required for all pain-related processing, but this circuitry has not been shown to be sufficient for conscious pain. Continuous endogenous fetal sedation is not supported by behavioral evidence, although the fetal neurochemical environment may modulate arousal and sensory processing. Maternal anesthesia, especially regional anesthesia, may not provide reliable fetal analgesic exposure. Professional guidance differs on the gestational age at which pain perception becomes possible.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical case for fetal analgesia should be separated from the unresolved question of conscious pain. Potential rationales include preventing possible suffering, attenuating documented physiological stress responses, and facilitating procedural stability. Decisions should therefore be based on a proportionate, procedure-specific maternal-fetal risk-benefit assessment rather than a universal precautionary default.
OBJECTIVES: To review fetal nociceptive development, the evidence and uncertainties relevant to pain perception, and the clinical rationale for fetal analgesia during invasive procedures.
METHODS: We performed a targeted narrative search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library, reference lists, and professional society websites. The final synthesis comprised 34 core sources.
RESULTS: Functional nociceptive and neuroendocrine responses to noxious stimuli are documented from the mid-second trimester and can be attenuated by fetal opioids. Early thalamic and subplate circuitry may challenge the claim that mature cortical architecture is required for all pain-related processing, but this circuitry has not been shown to be sufficient for conscious pain. Continuous endogenous fetal sedation is not supported by behavioral evidence, although the fetal neurochemical environment may modulate arousal and sensory processing. Maternal anesthesia, especially regional anesthesia, may not provide reliable fetal analgesic exposure. Professional guidance differs on the gestational age at which pain perception becomes possible.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical case for fetal analgesia should be separated from the unresolved question of conscious pain. Potential rationales include preventing possible suffering, attenuating documented physiological stress responses, and facilitating procedural stability. Decisions should therefore be based on a proportionate, procedure-specific maternal-fetal risk-benefit assessment rather than a universal precautionary default.