MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/02813432.2017.1398934

Медицинская библиотека · Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2017

Do patients consult their GP for sexual concerns? A cross sectional explorative study.

Vik Audun, Brekke Mette

СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To explore how often general practitioners (GPs) deal with patients' sexual concerns, what kind of concerns are brought up and how the GPs deal with them.

DESIGN

Cross sectional observational study.

SETTING/SUBJECTS: 22 GPs in Southern Norway.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The percentage of consultations dealing with sexual concerns during three consecutive working days, as registered by the GPs on a questionnaire.

RESULTS

Out of 1 117 consultations, 47 (4.2%) dealt with sexual concerns, varying from 1.6 to 10.9% of consultations. The concerns brought up varied widely, with erectile dysfunction and pain related to sexual activity in females as the largest groups. Concerns regarding sexual orientation, preferences or behavior were also dealt with, as were problems due to sexual assaults or rape. In 36 (76.6%) of the consultations, discussion of the problem and/or advice was the only action. Medication was prescribed in one third of the consultations. Patients' mean age was 46.7 years, with a span from 17 up to 75 years and 60% were female. We found no associations between GP characteristics and how frequently they dealt with sexual concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

In around 4% of consultations, the GPs dealt with a wide variety of sexual concerns.

Для цитирования: Vik Audun, Brekke Mette. Do patients consult their GP for sexual concerns? A cross sectional explorative study.. Scandinavian journal of primary health care. 2017. DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2017.1398934.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.