Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC · 2013
Improved adherence to colposcopy through nurse-led telephone counselling and multifaceted patient support.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dunn Sheila, Rossiter Lea, Ferne Jessica, Barnes Erin, Wu Wei
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: In 2009, an on-site diagnostic colposcopy clinic was established within a large, urban sexual health clinic to enhance follow-up of abnormal cervical cancer screening among vulnerable women, including those who are uninsured. This service model uses a family physician colposcopist and a colposcopy nurse who provides pre-visit counselling, telephone reminders, patient-tailored ongoing support during the diagnostic process, and tracking of missed appointments. This study examined whether this program was associated with improved adherence to the first colposcopy visit after an abnormal Papanicolau smear among a high needs population.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of women referred for colposcopy between January 2007 and September 2010, and examined non-adherence before (pre-group) and after (post-group) establishment of the on-site program. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was used to examine patient and clinical factors associated with non-adherence.
RESULTS: Six hundred eighty-five women were referred during the study period, with 302 in the pre-group and 383 in the post-group. Non-adherence to the first colposcopy visit fell from 13% to 4% after institution of the on-site service. Pre-group status, cervical screening performed at an abortion-related visit (as opposed to a contraception or cervical screening visit), parity ≥ 1 and younger age were all associated with non-adherence in the multivariable analysis.
CONCLUSION: An on-site colposcopy service that incorporated multifaceted, client-tailored support throughout the diagnostic process significantly reduced non-attendance for an initial colposcopy visit in an urban sexual health clinic population. Broader adoption of this model could improve effectiveness of cervical cancer screening programs. However, future research should determine which specific elements of the model are more important in influencing adherence rates.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of women referred for colposcopy between January 2007 and September 2010, and examined non-adherence before (pre-group) and after (post-group) establishment of the on-site program. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was used to examine patient and clinical factors associated with non-adherence.
RESULTS: Six hundred eighty-five women were referred during the study period, with 302 in the pre-group and 383 in the post-group. Non-adherence to the first colposcopy visit fell from 13% to 4% after institution of the on-site service. Pre-group status, cervical screening performed at an abortion-related visit (as opposed to a contraception or cervical screening visit), parity ≥ 1 and younger age were all associated with non-adherence in the multivariable analysis.
CONCLUSION: An on-site colposcopy service that incorporated multifaceted, client-tailored support throughout the diagnostic process significantly reduced non-attendance for an initial colposcopy visit in an urban sexual health clinic population. Broader adoption of this model could improve effectiveness of cervical cancer screening programs. However, future research should determine which specific elements of the model are more important in influencing adherence rates.