MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/0092623x.2012.668513

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of sex & marital therapy · 2013

Perceptions of partner's deception in friends with benefits relationships.

Quirk Kelley, Owen Jesse, Fincham Frank

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Friends-with-benefits relationships combine elements of friendship with sexual intimacy. Using hierarchical regression, the authors examined perceived deception in 310 relationships. In comparison with men, women reported greater deception by their friends-with-benefits partner. Perceived deception was inversely related to awareness of relational risk factors and directly related to anxious attachment, more sexual interactions as compared with friendship interactions in the relationship, and more favorable attitudes toward ambiguous commitment. Awareness of relational risk factors moderated the association between anxious attachment and perceptions of being deceived as awareness of relational risk factors was only negatively associated with perceived deception for those with lower levels of anxious attachment. Last, gender moderated the association between perceptions of being deceived and anxious attachment in that more anxious attachment was related to perceived deception for women, but not men. In particular, anxious attachment did not predict perceptions of deception for men, but greater degrees of anxious attachment for women increased perceptions of deception. Recommendations for assisting young adults to navigate this relational style are offered.

Для цитирования: Quirk Kelley, Owen Jesse, Fincham Frank. Perceptions of partner's deception in friends with benefits relationships.. Journal of sex & marital therapy. 2013. DOI: 10.1080/0092623x.2012.668513.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.