Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology · 2010
The unwillingness of future U.S. physicians to limit adolescent prevention counseling to abstinence-only messages.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
King Sallyann Coleman, Frank Erica
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Open family planning discussions are essential, though until very recently curtailed in the U.S., yet no study has evaluated future physicians' willingness to curtail their counseling.
DESIGN: Senior medical students at 16 U.S. schools (n=2316, response rate=80.3%) were surveyed on their agreement with: "I am willing to limit the sexually transmissible disease (STD) prevention counseling I do for unmarried teens to 'abstinence-only' messages."
RESULTS: Among seniors, <10% agreed to limit their counseling for unmarried teens to "abstinence-only" messages. Male gender, stronger religious identity, and more conservatism were most strongly associated with willingness to limit counseling.
CONCLUSIONS: Most senior U.S. medical students were not willing to limit the STD prevention counseling they provide. As the new U.S. (and other) governments re-evaluate policies, it is wise that they are reconsidering policies that ran counter to the beliefs of its future physician workforce.
DESIGN: Senior medical students at 16 U.S. schools (n=2316, response rate=80.3%) were surveyed on their agreement with: "I am willing to limit the sexually transmissible disease (STD) prevention counseling I do for unmarried teens to 'abstinence-only' messages."
RESULTS: Among seniors, <10% agreed to limit their counseling for unmarried teens to "abstinence-only" messages. Male gender, stronger religious identity, and more conservatism were most strongly associated with willingness to limit counseling.
CONCLUSIONS: Most senior U.S. medical students were not willing to limit the STD prevention counseling they provide. As the new U.S. (and other) governments re-evaluate policies, it is wise that they are reconsidering policies that ran counter to the beliefs of its future physician workforce.