Harm reduction journal · 2025
Desirable treatment or a problematic drug scene? - An interview study of patients' and professionals' views on the risks and benefits of liberalized opioid agonist treatment.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nordgren Johan, Richert Torkel
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) is a highly effective treatment option for people with opioid use disorder. The potent medications used create dilemmas regarding low or high thresholds to access treatment, patient autonomy and regulations. OAT in Scania County in the south of Sweden has seen the implementation of regulatory changes resulting in liberalization through a patient choice model and increased access to treatment. In this setting, in which OAT has developed from high threshold to low threshold because of policy changes at both national and local levels, we aimed to analyze how patients and staff view the risks and benefits of OAT.
METHODS: We conducted qualitative interviews with 32 OAT patients and 15 OAT staff in Malmö, Sweden. We analyzed the data with a thematic analysis approach.
RESULTS: Patients reported that OAT helped them to "stabilize" their lives although many felt a sense of being locked into treatment, which acted as a barrier to normalization. A significant risk was being offered illicit drugs by patients and dealers when visiting the clinic. Patients who had enrolled in OAT before liberalization found current guidelines too lenient and expressed worry that persons being enrolled were too young. Staff viewed liberalization with some ambivalence, with a positive view of increased access to OAT, although they had worries about the enrollment of young patients and difficulties supporting patients with ongoing drug use. Staff also viewed the sale of drugs in and outside of clinics as a significant problem. Some staff viewed medicines as the most important aspect of OAT, while others positioned the social support as most important.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient and staff perspectives were relatively congruent as they highlighted substantial risks regarding drug dealing at OAT clinics and were ambivalent toward the liberalization of OAT guidelines and the increased access to OAT. Liberalization impacted both patients and staff in their everyday lives and in professional practice, in a setting where OAT is both a desirable treatment and sometimes the basis of a problematic drug scene.
METHODS: We conducted qualitative interviews with 32 OAT patients and 15 OAT staff in Malmö, Sweden. We analyzed the data with a thematic analysis approach.
RESULTS: Patients reported that OAT helped them to "stabilize" their lives although many felt a sense of being locked into treatment, which acted as a barrier to normalization. A significant risk was being offered illicit drugs by patients and dealers when visiting the clinic. Patients who had enrolled in OAT before liberalization found current guidelines too lenient and expressed worry that persons being enrolled were too young. Staff viewed liberalization with some ambivalence, with a positive view of increased access to OAT, although they had worries about the enrollment of young patients and difficulties supporting patients with ongoing drug use. Staff also viewed the sale of drugs in and outside of clinics as a significant problem. Some staff viewed medicines as the most important aspect of OAT, while others positioned the social support as most important.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient and staff perspectives were relatively congruent as they highlighted substantial risks regarding drug dealing at OAT clinics and were ambivalent toward the liberalization of OAT guidelines and the increased access to OAT. Liberalization impacted both patients and staff in their everyday lives and in professional practice, in a setting where OAT is both a desirable treatment and sometimes the basis of a problematic drug scene.