MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090462

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ open · 2025

'Do they care?': a qualitative examination of patient perspectives on primary care clinician communication related to opioids in the USA.

Olson Anthony W, Bucaloiu Andrei, Allen Clayton I, Tusing Lorraine D, Henzler-Buckingham Hillary A, Gregor Christina M, Freitag Laura A, Hooker Stephanie A, Rossom Rebecca C, Solberg Leif I, Wright Eric A, Haller Irina V, Romagnoli Katrina M

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

This substudy's objectives were to (1) examine the transferability of a four archetype framework (simplified pattern of prototypical features) for patients at high risk for opioid use disorder (OUD) developed from a previous study with a similar population; (2) explore how patient preferences for terminology can inform clinician communication strategies for patients with OUD across archetypes and (3) explore how patient perceptions of opioid risks can inform clinician communication strategies across patient archetypes.

DESIGN

This qualitative study collected data via semistructured phone interviews with patients about views on opioid-related discussions with primary care clinicians. Qualitative data were coded using the Rigorous and Accelerated Data Reduction technique and analysed via iterative inductive/deductive thematic analysis.

SETTING

40 primary care clinics affiliated with two health systems (site1=Pennsylvania; site2=Minnesota, Wisconsin and North Dakota).

PARTICIPANTS

40 adults meeting one of the following: OUD diagnosis; taking medication for OUD (MOUD) and ≥3 opioid prescriptions in the previous year.

RESULTS

The aforementioned four archetype framework transferred well to the study sample and hinted at archetype differences in participant OUD-terminology preferences and opioid risk perceptions. Two additional archetypes of 'in treatment/recovery for OUD and not taking MOUD' and 'in treatment/recovery for OUD and taking MOUD' were identified. Participants best fitting archetypes 1-4 preferred clinicians to refrain from using addiction terminology to describe their relationship with opioids, finding the term 'dependence' as more appropriate and a signal that clinicians cared for patients. Participants who best first archetypes 5-6 felt 'addiction' was an appropriate, direct term that accurately described their condition, often using it themselves. Patients in all archetypes recognised risks of harm from using opioids, especially participants fitting archetypes 2, 5 and 6 who conveyed the greatest concern.

CONCLUSION

The modified six archetype framework may help clinicians tailor their communication and care for patients diagnosed with or at high risk for OUD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04198428.

Для цитирования: Olson Anthony W, Bucaloiu Andrei, Allen Clayton I, Tusing Lorraine D, Henzler-Buckingham Hillary A, Gregor Christina M, Freitag Laura A, Hooker Stephanie A, Rossom Rebecca C, Solberg Leif I, Wright Eric A, Haller Irina V, Romagnoli Katrina M. 'Do they care?': a qualitative examination of patient perspectives on primary care clinician communication related to opioids in the USA.. BMJ open. 2025. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090462.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.