Family medicine · 1997
Family practice residency behavioral science training: influence on graduate practice activity.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Prislin M D, Lenahan P, Shapiro J, Radecki S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The educational efficacy of family practice residency behavioral science training and how various educational approaches might influence graduate practice activity are poorly understood. In this study, we compare a traditional didactic and clinical block rotation approach to a problem-based learning (PBL) and clinical, experiential behavioral science curriculum.
METHODS: Surveys of pre- and post-intervention cohorts were used to assess graduates' perceptions of their understanding of broad behavioral science concepts, their competence to manage specific behavioral conditions, and their behavioral science practice activity. The two cohorts were University of California, Irvine family practice residency program graduates from 1984-1988 (58) and residency graduates from 1993-1995 (27). American Board of Family Practice (ABFP) In-service Training Examination scores were also compared.
RESULTS: No significant differences were detected in self-perceived competence and ABFP examination performance. Residency graduates in the post-intervention cohort more often included depression, marital counseling, and eating disorders in their practice and reported more frequent practice activity for situational stress and sexual dysfunction. The post-intervention group reported less involvement with alcohol and substance abuse problems. This group also reported practice activity that exceeded perceived levels of competence for attention deficit disorder, learning disorders, and eating disorders.
CONCLUSIONS: Participants in a PBL-clinical experiential curriculum reported higher levels of practice activity for several common behavioral problems. It seems unlikely that these differences were due to curriculum changes. Further investigation of the influence of educational and other factors on residency graduate practice activity is needed.
METHODS: Surveys of pre- and post-intervention cohorts were used to assess graduates' perceptions of their understanding of broad behavioral science concepts, their competence to manage specific behavioral conditions, and their behavioral science practice activity. The two cohorts were University of California, Irvine family practice residency program graduates from 1984-1988 (58) and residency graduates from 1993-1995 (27). American Board of Family Practice (ABFP) In-service Training Examination scores were also compared.
RESULTS: No significant differences were detected in self-perceived competence and ABFP examination performance. Residency graduates in the post-intervention cohort more often included depression, marital counseling, and eating disorders in their practice and reported more frequent practice activity for situational stress and sexual dysfunction. The post-intervention group reported less involvement with alcohol and substance abuse problems. This group also reported practice activity that exceeded perceived levels of competence for attention deficit disorder, learning disorders, and eating disorders.
CONCLUSIONS: Participants in a PBL-clinical experiential curriculum reported higher levels of practice activity for several common behavioral problems. It seems unlikely that these differences were due to curriculum changes. Further investigation of the influence of educational and other factors on residency graduate practice activity is needed.