MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11673-024-10387-3

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2024

Clinicians' Perspectives and an Ethical Analysis of Safer Supply Opioid Prescribing.

Bird Kathleen, Genuis Quentin, Ickowicz Sarah

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

In British Columbia, Canada, many physicians providing care to individuals with high-risk opioid use disorder adopted safer supply (SS) opioid prescribing in the spring of 2020 with the goal of facilitating public health measures for COVID-19. This prescribing practice continued after measures were lifted. This study aimed to explore prescribers' perspectives following several years of local experience in prescribing SS opioids, primarily in the form of hydromorphone tablets, and to apply ethical concepts to explore current challenges and ongoing sources of provider distress. Addiction medicine SS prescribers participated in individual or small group semi-structured interviews. Each interview was transcribed and analysed for recurrent themes. Themes were then integrated into a narrative ethics discussion. Eleven addiction medicine physicians practicing in various settings within Vancouver participated in this study. Six themes were identified: clinical assessment, clinician distress, gaps in care, models of safer supply, research, and special populations. Ethical dilemmas in prescribing SS are identified and explored through a discussion of biomedical ethics principles and the physician role.

Для цитирования: Bird Kathleen, Genuis Quentin, Ickowicz Sarah. Clinicians' Perspectives and an Ethical Analysis of Safer Supply Opioid Prescribing.. Journal of bioethical inquiry. 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s11673-024-10387-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.