MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/add.16620

Медицинская библиотека · Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2024

Client preferences for the design and delivery of injectable opioid agonist treatment services: Results from a best-worst scaling task.

Metcalfe Rebecca Kathleen, Dobischok Sophia, Bansback Nick, MacDonald Scott, Byres David, Lajeunesse Julie, Harrison Scott, Koch Bryce, Topping Blue, Brock Terry, Foreman Julie, Schechter Martin, Oviedo-Joekes Eugenia

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Clinical trials support injectable opioid agonist treatment (iOAT) for individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) for whom other pharmacological management approaches are not well-suited. However, despite substantial research indicating that person-centered care improves engagement, retention and health outcomes for individuals with OUD, structural requirements (e.g. drug policies) often dictate how iOAT must be delivered, regardless of client preferences. This study aimed to quantify clients' iOAT delivery preferences to improve client engagement and retention.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional preference elicitation survey.

SETTING

Metro Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

124 current and former iOAT clients.

MEASUREMENTS: Participants completed a demographic questionnaire package and an interviewer-led preference elicitation survey (case 2 best-worst scaling task). Latent class analysis was used to identify distinct preference groups and explore demographic differences between preference groups.

FINDINGS: Most participants (n = 100; 81%) were current iOAT clients. Latent class analysis identified two distinct groups of client preferences: (1) autonomous decision-makers (n = 73; 59%) and (2) shared decision-makers (n = 51; 41%). These groups had different preferences for how medication type and dosage were selected. Both groups prioritized access to take-home medication (i.e. carries), the ability to set their own schedule, receiving iOAT in a space they like and having other services available at iOAT clinics. Compared with shared decision-makers, fewer autonomous decision-makers identified as a cis-male/man and reported flexible preferences.

CONCLUSIONS

Injectable opioid agonist treatment (iOAT) clients surveyed in Vancouver, Canada, appear to prefer greater autonomy than they currently have in choosing OAT medication type, dosage and treatment schedule.

Для цитирования: Metcalfe Rebecca Kathleen, Dobischok Sophia, Bansback Nick, MacDonald Scott, Byres David, Lajeunesse Julie, Harrison Scott, Koch Bryce, Topping Blue, Brock Terry, Foreman Julie, Schechter Martin, Oviedo-Joekes Eugenia. Client preferences for the design and delivery of injectable opioid agonist treatment services: Results from a best-worst scaling task.. Addiction (Abingdon, England). 2024. DOI: 10.1111/add.16620.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.