Annals of epidemiology · 2024
Comparison of emergency medical services and emergency department encounter trends for nonfatal opioid-involved overdoses, nine states, United States, 2020-2022.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Casillas Shannon M, Stokes Erin K, Vivolo-Kantor Alana M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Opioid-involved overdoses, especially those involving synthetic opioids like fentanyl, have driven increases in overdose morbidity and mortality. Emergency medical services (EMS) and emergency department (ED) data can each provide near real-time information on trends in nonfatal opioid-involved overdoses; however, minimal data exist on the comparability of trends in these two data sources.
METHODS: EMS data from biospatial© and ED data from CDC's Drug Overdose Surveillance and Epidemiology system and National Syndromic Surveillance Program were queried for nine states. Counts of total encounters, opioid-involved overdose encounters, and rates of opioid-involved overdoses per 10,000 total encounters were calculated for each data source from 2020 to 2022. Trends in monthly counts and rates were assessed using Joinpoint regression.
RESULTS: On average, EMS data captured 1.8 times more monthly opioid-involved overdose encounters than ED data. Trends in the counts of opioid-involved overdose encounters were similar in both data sources with increases and decreases occurring during roughly the same periods. Overall, trends in rates of opioid-involved overdose encounters were also comparable.
CONCLUSIONS: EMS and ED data provide complementary information for understanding overdose trends. Study findings underscore the importance of implementing post-overdose response protocols by both EMS and ED providers to ensure patients receive services irrespective of care setting.
METHODS: EMS data from biospatial© and ED data from CDC's Drug Overdose Surveillance and Epidemiology system and National Syndromic Surveillance Program were queried for nine states. Counts of total encounters, opioid-involved overdose encounters, and rates of opioid-involved overdoses per 10,000 total encounters were calculated for each data source from 2020 to 2022. Trends in monthly counts and rates were assessed using Joinpoint regression.
RESULTS: On average, EMS data captured 1.8 times more monthly opioid-involved overdose encounters than ED data. Trends in the counts of opioid-involved overdose encounters were similar in both data sources with increases and decreases occurring during roughly the same periods. Overall, trends in rates of opioid-involved overdose encounters were also comparable.
CONCLUSIONS: EMS and ED data provide complementary information for understanding overdose trends. Study findings underscore the importance of implementing post-overdose response protocols by both EMS and ED providers to ensure patients receive services irrespective of care setting.