Sexually transmitted diseases · 2023
Sexual and Reproductive Health Care Visits as a Venue for Preexposure Prophylaxis Service Delivery Among Women in the United States: Results From a Nationally Representative Survey.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Weigel Gabriela, Theva Meena, Hardy Erica, Wagner Stephen, Brown Benjamin
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV is disproportionately underprescribed to women. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines identify a group of women at risk of HIV acquisition who should be offered PrEP, but opportunities remain to improve patient awareness of and provider counseling about PrEP and to expand service delivery of PrEP.
METHODS: Using nationally representative data from the 2017-2019 National Survey of Family Growth, we compared women with (n = 689) and without (n = 5,452) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indications for PrEP on measures of PrEP awareness, counseling by a provider, and interaction with the health care system.
RESULTS: Women with PrEP indications were no more likely to report awareness of PrEP (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-1.29) or PrEP counseling by a provider (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.77-2.27), compared with those without PrEP indications. However, women with PrEP indications were more likely than those without to report a birth control visit (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.39-2.38) or an abortion within the last 12 months (OR, 5.93; 95% CI, 1.48-23.73), and to currently use prescription contraception (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.19-1.78). A majority of both groups reported accessing prenatal care within the last 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS: There remains a gap in PrEP awareness and counseling among women at highest risk for HIV acquisition. Sexual and reproductive health visits represent a logical and feasible venue for PrEP provision. Obstetrician-gynecologists and other family planning providers may be able to aid in service delivery innovations by providing PrEP alongside other sexual and reproductive health care.
METHODS: Using nationally representative data from the 2017-2019 National Survey of Family Growth, we compared women with (n = 689) and without (n = 5,452) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indications for PrEP on measures of PrEP awareness, counseling by a provider, and interaction with the health care system.
RESULTS: Women with PrEP indications were no more likely to report awareness of PrEP (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-1.29) or PrEP counseling by a provider (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.77-2.27), compared with those without PrEP indications. However, women with PrEP indications were more likely than those without to report a birth control visit (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.39-2.38) or an abortion within the last 12 months (OR, 5.93; 95% CI, 1.48-23.73), and to currently use prescription contraception (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.19-1.78). A majority of both groups reported accessing prenatal care within the last 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS: There remains a gap in PrEP awareness and counseling among women at highest risk for HIV acquisition. Sexual and reproductive health visits represent a logical and feasible venue for PrEP provision. Obstetrician-gynecologists and other family planning providers may be able to aid in service delivery innovations by providing PrEP alongside other sexual and reproductive health care.