African journal of health sciences · 2017
Do clients receiving Home based testing and counselling (HBTC) utilize the HIV prevention messages delivered? A study among residents in an urban informal settlement in Kenya who previously received HBTC.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Oluoch P, Achia T, Mutinda D, Orwa J, Oundo J, Karama M, Ng'ang'a Z
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Home based HIV testing and counseling (HBTC) increases access to services and is associated with high testing uptake. Alongside testing, individuals are offered HIV prevention messages with an aim of helping them reduce HIV high risk sexual behaviors. This study explored the level of provision and subsequent utilization of HIV prevention messages and associated change in behavior among individuals who had received HBTC previously in an informal settlement.
METHODS: In a mixed method cross sectional study, we interviewed 1257 individuals and conducted 6 focus group discussions (FGD). Multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) was used to construct provision of prevention messages and behavior change indices using STATA 3.0. Pearson's chi-square statistics was used to test for bivariate association between the outcomes and logistic regression analysis was carried out with the behavior change index as the outcome of interest and the predictors considered significant (p<0.1). Thematic content analysis for qualitative data was done using Atlas 3.0.
RESULTS: Out of the 1257participants, 1078 (85.8%) had ever tested for HIV, with 74.2% having tested in the Kibera HBTC program. Nearly all (97.4%) rated HBTC experience as either excellent (62.4%) or good (37%) and would recommend it to a friend. Provision of prevention messages was high among HBTC clients compared to clients from other testing sites; partner reduction counselling (64% versus 52%) and faithfulness (78.3% versus 67%); p=0.001. Self-reported behavior change after HBTC was generally low with condom use at 10.7% and men more likely to practice safer sex (p = 0.002). Trust of the sexual partners and fear of suspicion were the main reasons given for not using condoms. Clients testing HIV positive after previous negative result were 3.4%. The focus group discussions reported multiple sexual partnerships among both HIV negative and positive residents alike.
CONCLUSION: Although prevention messages delivered during HBTC are accepted and appreciated in this community, their utilization is low in both HIV negative and positive individuals. Innovative strategies for change of normative beliefs about sexual behavior are urgently needed.
METHODS: In a mixed method cross sectional study, we interviewed 1257 individuals and conducted 6 focus group discussions (FGD). Multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) was used to construct provision of prevention messages and behavior change indices using STATA 3.0. Pearson's chi-square statistics was used to test for bivariate association between the outcomes and logistic regression analysis was carried out with the behavior change index as the outcome of interest and the predictors considered significant (p<0.1). Thematic content analysis for qualitative data was done using Atlas 3.0.
RESULTS: Out of the 1257participants, 1078 (85.8%) had ever tested for HIV, with 74.2% having tested in the Kibera HBTC program. Nearly all (97.4%) rated HBTC experience as either excellent (62.4%) or good (37%) and would recommend it to a friend. Provision of prevention messages was high among HBTC clients compared to clients from other testing sites; partner reduction counselling (64% versus 52%) and faithfulness (78.3% versus 67%); p=0.001. Self-reported behavior change after HBTC was generally low with condom use at 10.7% and men more likely to practice safer sex (p = 0.002). Trust of the sexual partners and fear of suspicion were the main reasons given for not using condoms. Clients testing HIV positive after previous negative result were 3.4%. The focus group discussions reported multiple sexual partnerships among both HIV negative and positive residents alike.
CONCLUSION: Although prevention messages delivered during HBTC are accepted and appreciated in this community, their utilization is low in both HIV negative and positive individuals. Innovative strategies for change of normative beliefs about sexual behavior are urgently needed.