MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1049732313482189

Медицинская библиотека · Qualitative health research · 2013

Contextual barriers and motivators to adult male medical circumcision in Rakai, Uganda.

Ssekubugu Robert, Leontsini Elli, Wawer Maria J, Serwadda David, Kigozi Godfrey, Kennedy Caitlin E, Nalugoda Fred, Sekamwa Richard, Wagman Jennifer, Gray Ronald H

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Medical male circumcision (MMC) is a central component of HIV prevention. In this study we examined barriers to and facilitators of MMC in Rakai, Uganda. Interviews and focus groups with MMC acceptors, decliners, and community members were collected and analyzed iteratively. Themes were developed based on immersion, repeated reading, sorting, and coding of data using grounded theory. Pain, medical complications, infertility, lack of empirical efficacy, waiting time before resumption of sex, and religion were identified as obstacles to MMC acceptance. Prevention and healing of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), access to HIV and other ancillary care, penile hygiene, and peer influence were key motivators. Voluntary counseling and testing for HIV, partner influence, and sexual potency were both barriers and motivators. Individual and societal factors, such as pain and religion, might slow MMC scale up. Health benefits, such as HIV/STI prevention and penile hygiene, are essential in motivating men to accept MMC.

Для цитирования: Ssekubugu Robert, Leontsini Elli, Wawer Maria J, Serwadda David, Kigozi Godfrey, Kennedy Caitlin E, Nalugoda Fred, Sekamwa Richard, Wagman Jennifer, Gray Ronald H. Contextual barriers and motivators to adult male medical circumcision in Rakai, Uganda.. Qualitative health research. 2013. DOI: 10.1177/1049732313482189.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.