Sexually transmitted diseases · 1998
Increasing barrier method use among oral contraceptive users at risk of STDs. What approach is best?
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Steiner M J, Glover L H, Bou-Saada I, Piedrahita C
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated whether offering a choice of barrier methods can increase overall barrier method use without decreasing condom use in women using oral contraceptives (OCs) for contraception.
STUDY DESIGN: We randomized 167 OC users at risk for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) into two groups, one receiving male latex condoms only (Condom group), the other receiving both male latex condoms and nonoxynol-9 film (Choice group). All participants received similar hierarchical STD protection counseling. We assessed method use with daily diaries.
RESULTS: The Choice group protected a significantly higher percentage of their coital acts with a barrier method (month 1 to 2: 29% vs. 22%; month 3 to 4: 33% vs. 21%; and month 5 to 6: 35% vs. 19%; adjusted P = 0.012). Condom use in the Choice group was higher as well (adjusted P = 0.036). When we used a transitional multilogistic regression approach to account for differential loss to follow-up in the two groups, results were similar.
CONCLUSIONS: Offering a choice of barrier methods increased overall barrier method use without decreasing condom use.
STUDY DESIGN: We randomized 167 OC users at risk for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) into two groups, one receiving male latex condoms only (Condom group), the other receiving both male latex condoms and nonoxynol-9 film (Choice group). All participants received similar hierarchical STD protection counseling. We assessed method use with daily diaries.
RESULTS: The Choice group protected a significantly higher percentage of their coital acts with a barrier method (month 1 to 2: 29% vs. 22%; month 3 to 4: 33% vs. 21%; and month 5 to 6: 35% vs. 19%; adjusted P = 0.012). Condom use in the Choice group was higher as well (adjusted P = 0.036). When we used a transitional multilogistic regression approach to account for differential loss to follow-up in the two groups, results were similar.
CONCLUSIONS: Offering a choice of barrier methods increased overall barrier method use without decreasing condom use.