Surgery · 2023
Are postoperative opioid stewardship protocols sustainable? Results from a 2-year quality improvement project.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Melucci Alexa D, Loria Anthony, Swanson Holli, White Quarnisha, Moalem Jacob, Fleming Fergal J, Temple Larissa K
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Opioid stewardship protocols reduce opioid overprescription, but many require corrective action within 1 year. Because there are limited data on the sustainability of opioid reduction protocols, we sought to evaluate prescribing trends beyond 1 year.
METHODS: We reviewed prescribing data from a tertiary care center to establish a consensus discharge opioid-prescribing guideline. Subsequently, we performed a prospective quality-improvement study for patients on an enhanced recovery protocol undergoing elective colectomies, proctectomies, and stoma-related procedures. We gathered process (protocol compliance), balance (rates of patient-controlled analgesia and nerve blocks, inpatient opioid utilization, pain scores within 48 hours of discharge), and clinical measures (median discharge opioid pills, postdischarge day 7 satisfaction).
RESULTS: In total, 1,049 patients with similar ages, operative indications, and rates of substance use pre- and postintervention were included. Over 2 years, compliance was 88.6%, and there was a 43.6% reduction in the total discharge number of opioid pills. Phone calls for opioid refills were stable (10.2% pre- vs 7.8% postintervention, P = .16), and the following all decreased significantly: intraoperative nerve blocks, patient-controlled analgesia use, and final 48-hour and total median inpatient opioid use. There was a clinically negligible, statistically significant reduction in pain scores within 48 hours of discharge. Fifty patients provided satisfaction data, and 92% were satisfied or somewhat satisfied with their analgesia.
CONCLUSION: Over 2 years, reduced opioid prescribing was maintained without escalating resources. Sustainability suggests that after successfully implementing an opioid reduction protocol, institutions may safely redeploy quality improvement resources elsewhere.
METHODS: We reviewed prescribing data from a tertiary care center to establish a consensus discharge opioid-prescribing guideline. Subsequently, we performed a prospective quality-improvement study for patients on an enhanced recovery protocol undergoing elective colectomies, proctectomies, and stoma-related procedures. We gathered process (protocol compliance), balance (rates of patient-controlled analgesia and nerve blocks, inpatient opioid utilization, pain scores within 48 hours of discharge), and clinical measures (median discharge opioid pills, postdischarge day 7 satisfaction).
RESULTS: In total, 1,049 patients with similar ages, operative indications, and rates of substance use pre- and postintervention were included. Over 2 years, compliance was 88.6%, and there was a 43.6% reduction in the total discharge number of opioid pills. Phone calls for opioid refills were stable (10.2% pre- vs 7.8% postintervention, P = .16), and the following all decreased significantly: intraoperative nerve blocks, patient-controlled analgesia use, and final 48-hour and total median inpatient opioid use. There was a clinically negligible, statistically significant reduction in pain scores within 48 hours of discharge. Fifty patients provided satisfaction data, and 92% were satisfied or somewhat satisfied with their analgesia.
CONCLUSION: Over 2 years, reduced opioid prescribing was maintained without escalating resources. Sustainability suggests that after successfully implementing an opioid reduction protocol, institutions may safely redeploy quality improvement resources elsewhere.