The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2025
The effects of the Multicultural Healthy Diet on cognitive decline and Alzheimer's disease risk: a phase II randomized controlled trial in middle-aged adults.
СтатьяКлиническое исследование II фазыРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mossavar-Rahmani Yasmin, Hyun Noorie, Hakun Jonathan G, Katz Mindy J, Pavlovic Jelena M, Zetterberg Henrik, Wang Zheng, Yang Jasper B, Wylie-Rosett Judith, Hebert James R, Sliwinski Martin J, Shaw Pamela A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Anti-inflammatory dietary patterns are associated with slower cognitive decline in older adults; however, little is known about the effects of an anti-inflammatory dietary pattern in middle age.
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to adapt an anti-inflammatory diet to a multicultural setting and assess its impact on cognitive decline and Alzheimer's disease risk and related dementias in healthy middle-aged adults.
METHODS: We performed a phase II pilot randomized clinical trial in adults (40-65 y old; n = 290) in Bronx, New York. Participants were assigned to follow either the Multicultural Healthy Diet (MHD), an anti-inflammatory diet, or usual diet (Comparison). Diet was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute's Automated Self-Administered 24-h food records. The primary cognitive outcome was assessed at 9 mo after randomization using a global composite score derived from 3 ambulatory cognitive assessments of visuospatial memory (Grid Memory), processing speed (Symbol Search) and short-term associative memory binding (Color Shapes). Secondary outcomes included performance on individual tests and association of dietary components with cognitive performance.
RESULTS: At 9-mo follow-up, the MHD arm had a lower Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) score based on self-reported diet, with an adjusted MHD minus Comparison difference of -0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI): -1.02, -0.27] and -0.94 (95% CI: -1.34, -0.54) for the DII and energy-adjusted DII scores, respectively, indicating intervention participants had adhered to an anti-inflammatory dietary pattern. Group session and telephone contact completion averaged 93% and 72%, respectively, for the MHD arm. No statistically significant difference between arms was found in the primary outcome-cognitive global score change-from baseline: -0.06 (95% CI: -0.15, 0.04), P = .259.
CONCLUSIONS: The MHD is feasible and acceptable in this multicultural United States cohort. Although the influence of MHD at 9 mo is nonsignificant based on the global composite cognitive score, additional research using other measures such as day-to-day variability in cognitive function and peak performance is warranted. This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03240406 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03240406?term=Diet%20%26%20Cognition&page=3&rank=30).
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to adapt an anti-inflammatory diet to a multicultural setting and assess its impact on cognitive decline and Alzheimer's disease risk and related dementias in healthy middle-aged adults.
METHODS: We performed a phase II pilot randomized clinical trial in adults (40-65 y old; n = 290) in Bronx, New York. Participants were assigned to follow either the Multicultural Healthy Diet (MHD), an anti-inflammatory diet, or usual diet (Comparison). Diet was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute's Automated Self-Administered 24-h food records. The primary cognitive outcome was assessed at 9 mo after randomization using a global composite score derived from 3 ambulatory cognitive assessments of visuospatial memory (Grid Memory), processing speed (Symbol Search) and short-term associative memory binding (Color Shapes). Secondary outcomes included performance on individual tests and association of dietary components with cognitive performance.
RESULTS: At 9-mo follow-up, the MHD arm had a lower Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) score based on self-reported diet, with an adjusted MHD minus Comparison difference of -0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI): -1.02, -0.27] and -0.94 (95% CI: -1.34, -0.54) for the DII and energy-adjusted DII scores, respectively, indicating intervention participants had adhered to an anti-inflammatory dietary pattern. Group session and telephone contact completion averaged 93% and 72%, respectively, for the MHD arm. No statistically significant difference between arms was found in the primary outcome-cognitive global score change-from baseline: -0.06 (95% CI: -0.15, 0.04), P = .259.
CONCLUSIONS: The MHD is feasible and acceptable in this multicultural United States cohort. Although the influence of MHD at 9 mo is nonsignificant based on the global composite cognitive score, additional research using other measures such as day-to-day variability in cognitive function and peak performance is warranted. This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03240406 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03240406?term=Diet%20%26%20Cognition&page=3&rank=30).