Nutrients · 2019
The Dietary Inflammatory Index and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia in the MCC Spain Study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Flores José Carlos, Gracia-Lavedan Esther, Benavente Yolanda, Amiano Pilar, Romaguera Dora, Costas Laura, Robles Claudia, Gonzalez-Barca Eva, de la Banda Esmeralda, Alonso Esther, Aymerich Marta, Campo Elias, Dierssen-Sotos Trinidad, Marcos-Gragera Rafael, Rodriguez-Suarez Marta María, Solans Marta, Gimeno Eva, Garcia Martin Paloma, Aragones Nuria, Shivappa Nitin, Hébert James R, Pollan Marina, Kogevinas Manolis, de Sanjose Silvia, Castaño-Vinyals Gemma, Casabonne Delphine
Аннотация
Chronic inflammation plays a role in the development of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), and diet might modulate chronic inflammation. This study aims to evaluate the association between the dietary inflammatory index (DII®) and CLL. A total of 366 CLL cases and 1643 controls of the Spanish multicase-control (MCC) Spain study were included. The inflammatory potential of the diet was assessed using the energy-adjusted dietary inflammatory index (E-DII) based on 30 items from a validated semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using logistic regression models controlling for potential confounders. Overall, a modest, non-statistically significant, positive association was observed between CLL and E-DII scores (OR for a one-unit increase in E-DII: 1.05 (CI 95%: 0.99, 1.12), p-value = 0.09 and by tertiles: ORT2vsT1: 1.20 (CI 95%: 0.90, 1.59); OR T3vsT1: 1.21 (CI 95%: 0.90, 1.62), p trend = 0.21). These results were independent from disease severity (p-het: 0.70), time from diagnosis (p-het: 0.67) and CLL treatment received (p-het: 0.56). No interactions were detected. In conclusion, the consumption of a diet with high pro-inflammatory components was not significantly associated with CLL. Changes towards a more pro-inflammatory dietary pattern in younger generations not included here warrant future research.