Diabetes research and clinical practice · 2010
Effect of a continuous diabetes lifestyle intervention program on male workers in Korea.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kang Ji Yeon, Cho Sang Woon, Sung Sook Hee, Park Yoo Kyoung, Paek Yun Mi, Choi Tae In
Аннотация
AIMS: This study was conducted to compare the effects of two years of lifestyle intervention to no intervention or one year of intervention on diabetes risk factors in male workers with impaired fasting glucose (IFG) or diabetes.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized lifestyle intervention trial designed to alter personal lifestyles among 123 industrial male workers (CG; control group, n=75; OIG; one-year intervention group, n=23; TIG; two-year intervention group, n=25). The intervention consisted of two parts, the main program (face-to-face counseling five times/12 weeks) and a follow-up program (e-mail counseling ten times/30 weeks). Assessments included biochemical characteristics, anthropometry and nutrient intake at baseline and after two years.
RESULTS: After two years, systolic blood pressure, HOMA-IR, HDL cholesterol and total energy intake (p<0.05) were reduced in the OIG group, while weight, body mass index, waist circumference, blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), HbA1c and nutrient intake (total energy, carbohydrate, protein and sodium) were significantly decreased (p<0.05, respectively) in the TIG group. When compared to the CG, subjects in OIG and TIG showed significant improvements in the level of FPG and HbA1c (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Continuous lifestyle intervention for two years is more effective at improving diabetes risk factors than OIG.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized lifestyle intervention trial designed to alter personal lifestyles among 123 industrial male workers (CG; control group, n=75; OIG; one-year intervention group, n=23; TIG; two-year intervention group, n=25). The intervention consisted of two parts, the main program (face-to-face counseling five times/12 weeks) and a follow-up program (e-mail counseling ten times/30 weeks). Assessments included biochemical characteristics, anthropometry and nutrient intake at baseline and after two years.
RESULTS: After two years, systolic blood pressure, HOMA-IR, HDL cholesterol and total energy intake (p<0.05) were reduced in the OIG group, while weight, body mass index, waist circumference, blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), HbA1c and nutrient intake (total energy, carbohydrate, protein and sodium) were significantly decreased (p<0.05, respectively) in the TIG group. When compared to the CG, subjects in OIG and TIG showed significant improvements in the level of FPG and HbA1c (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Continuous lifestyle intervention for two years is more effective at improving diabetes risk factors than OIG.