American journal of health promotion : AJHP · 2018
A Pilot Clinical Trial of Smoking Cessation Services Implemented in the Workplace for Service Industry Employees.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаResearch Support, N.I.H., IntramuralПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bold Krysten W, Kimmel Lisa, Hanrahan Tess H, Romano Denise, Rojewski Alana M, Krishnan-Sarin Suchitra, Fucito Lisa M, O'Malley Stephanie S
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of implementing evidence-based tobacco treatment at the workplace for service industry employees.
DESIGN: Randomized trial using 6 paired worksites (3 test and 3 delayed intervention control sites).
SETTING: US Northeast city.
PARTICIPANTS: Employees were recruited from university food service settings.
INTERVENTION: Comprehensive smoking treatment was provided at the workplace including individual counseling, free pharmacotherapy (dual nicotine replacement therapy or varenicline), and 5 weeks of contingency management that reinforced abstinence or reductions in smoking to encourage progress toward quitting.
MEASURES: Primary measures included a smoking status survey administered at the end of treatment at the test sites and before treatment began at the delayed intervention control sites.
ANALYSIS: Analyses compared rates of quit attempts and successful abstinence for at least 24 hours between the test and delayed intervention control sites.
RESULTS: Twenty-five employees were enrolled in treatment. The majority were single (12/25), black (16/25), and reported their educational attainment as high school or less (18/25). Employees in the test (vs delayed intervention control) sites reported higher rates of quit attempts (66.7% vs 12.5%, P = .02) and success quitting for at least 24 hours (53.3% vs 12.5%, P = .08). Participants rated the treatment as very helpful overall.
CONCLUSION: Findings support the feasibility and efficacy of providing workplace-based smoking cessation services and may inform strategies to increase access to treatment.
DESIGN: Randomized trial using 6 paired worksites (3 test and 3 delayed intervention control sites).
SETTING: US Northeast city.
PARTICIPANTS: Employees were recruited from university food service settings.
INTERVENTION: Comprehensive smoking treatment was provided at the workplace including individual counseling, free pharmacotherapy (dual nicotine replacement therapy or varenicline), and 5 weeks of contingency management that reinforced abstinence or reductions in smoking to encourage progress toward quitting.
MEASURES: Primary measures included a smoking status survey administered at the end of treatment at the test sites and before treatment began at the delayed intervention control sites.
ANALYSIS: Analyses compared rates of quit attempts and successful abstinence for at least 24 hours between the test and delayed intervention control sites.
RESULTS: Twenty-five employees were enrolled in treatment. The majority were single (12/25), black (16/25), and reported their educational attainment as high school or less (18/25). Employees in the test (vs delayed intervention control) sites reported higher rates of quit attempts (66.7% vs 12.5%, P = .02) and success quitting for at least 24 hours (53.3% vs 12.5%, P = .08). Participants rated the treatment as very helpful overall.
CONCLUSION: Findings support the feasibility and efficacy of providing workplace-based smoking cessation services and may inform strategies to increase access to treatment.