Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2025
Perineal wound complications after proctectomy for Crohn's disease: the impact of the omental pedicle flap and predictors of return to the operating room.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Reynolds Ian S, Gleason Lauren, Hajjar Roy, Khan Sidrah, Sanchez Emilio, Bews Katherine A, Martinez-Jorge Jorys, Perry William R, Mathis Kellie L, McKenna Nicholas P
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The role of omental pedicle flaps (OPFs) in reducing the risk of perineal wound complications and postoperative pelvic abscesses in patients with Crohn's disease remains unclear. This study aimed to determine whether OPFs had any effect on the incidence of perineal wound complications requiring a return to the operating room (OR) or the requirement for radiologic-guided drainage of pelvic abscesses in patients with Crohn's disease who underwent proctectomy.
METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center study. The study included patients who underwent proctectomy for Crohn's disease with primary perineal closure, with or without an OPF. The primary outcome measures were return to the OR for perineal wound complications or the requirement for radiologically guided drainage of pelvic abscesses.
RESULTS: A total of 219 patients (71 with flap and 148 without flap) underwent proctectomy during the study period. No differences were observed in the rate of unplanned return to the OR (11.27% in the OPF group vs 9.46% in the non-OPF group; P =.81) or the number of patients requiring radiologically guided drainage of pelvic abscesses (11.27% in the OPF group vs 6.76% in the non-OPF group, respectively; P =.30) between the cohorts. Patients in the flap cohort were more likely to have a history of tobacco use (P =.02), fistulizing perianal disease (P =.01), undergo extrasphincteric dissection (P =.03), and use incisional wound vacuum assisted closure (VAC) at the time of surgery (P =.02).
CONCLUSION: Careful patient selection for the OPF might play a role in reducing wound complications to a level similar to that observed in patients with lower-risk perineal wounds.
METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center study. The study included patients who underwent proctectomy for Crohn's disease with primary perineal closure, with or without an OPF. The primary outcome measures were return to the OR for perineal wound complications or the requirement for radiologically guided drainage of pelvic abscesses.
RESULTS: A total of 219 patients (71 with flap and 148 without flap) underwent proctectomy during the study period. No differences were observed in the rate of unplanned return to the OR (11.27% in the OPF group vs 9.46% in the non-OPF group; P =.81) or the number of patients requiring radiologically guided drainage of pelvic abscesses (11.27% in the OPF group vs 6.76% in the non-OPF group, respectively; P =.30) between the cohorts. Patients in the flap cohort were more likely to have a history of tobacco use (P =.02), fistulizing perianal disease (P =.01), undergo extrasphincteric dissection (P =.03), and use incisional wound vacuum assisted closure (VAC) at the time of surgery (P =.02).
CONCLUSION: Careful patient selection for the OPF might play a role in reducing wound complications to a level similar to that observed in patients with lower-risk perineal wounds.