Annals of surgical oncology · 2015
Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Minichromosome Maintenance Protein 7 (MCM7), Topoisomerase IIα, and Ki-67 in Diffuse Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma Patients Using Tissue Microarray.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Deraco Marcello, Cabras Antonello, Baratti Dario, Kusamura Shigeki
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Immunohistochemistry and tissue microarray (TMA) were used to perform a prognostic analysis of markers related to cell proliferation in diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM).
METHODS: Clinicopathologic data were extracted from a prospectively collected database containing cases of peritoneal mesothelioma treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the National Cancer Institute of Milan from 1995 to 2013. Eighty-one DMPM patients were recruited and their tissue samples were used to construct TMAs. We evaluated the immunoexpressions of markers related to cell proliferation-topoisomerase IIα, minichromosome maintenance protein 7 (MCM7), and Ki-67-and then conducted a multivariate Cox model to identify the predictors of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) among the following parameters: age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, baseline serum albumin, Charlson Comorbidity Index, previous systemic chemotherapy, histological subtype (epithelioid vs. biphasic/sarcomatoid), peritoneal cancer index, completeness of cytoreduction (CC), and proliferative biological markers.
RESULTS: The rates of high/intermediate immunoreactivity were 95 % for topoisomerase IIα and 90 % for MCM7, and the median Ki-67 labeling index was 5 %. The independent predictors of OS were baseline serum albumin >3.5 g/dl, CC, and Ki-67 >5 %, whereas those for PFS were an ECOG performance status of 0, baseline serum albumin >3.5 g/dl, Charlson Comorbidity Index >3, previous systemic chemotherapy, morbidity G3-5, and Ki-67 >5 %. The remaining biological markers were not associated with outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: Ki-67 was found to be a new powerful determinant of outcome. Patients with a Ki-67 labeling index >5 % carry a very poor prognosis and do not benefit from the combined procedure. Further studies should be conducted to confirm the present data.
METHODS: Clinicopathologic data were extracted from a prospectively collected database containing cases of peritoneal mesothelioma treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the National Cancer Institute of Milan from 1995 to 2013. Eighty-one DMPM patients were recruited and their tissue samples were used to construct TMAs. We evaluated the immunoexpressions of markers related to cell proliferation-topoisomerase IIα, minichromosome maintenance protein 7 (MCM7), and Ki-67-and then conducted a multivariate Cox model to identify the predictors of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) among the following parameters: age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, baseline serum albumin, Charlson Comorbidity Index, previous systemic chemotherapy, histological subtype (epithelioid vs. biphasic/sarcomatoid), peritoneal cancer index, completeness of cytoreduction (CC), and proliferative biological markers.
RESULTS: The rates of high/intermediate immunoreactivity were 95 % for topoisomerase IIα and 90 % for MCM7, and the median Ki-67 labeling index was 5 %. The independent predictors of OS were baseline serum albumin >3.5 g/dl, CC, and Ki-67 >5 %, whereas those for PFS were an ECOG performance status of 0, baseline serum albumin >3.5 g/dl, Charlson Comorbidity Index >3, previous systemic chemotherapy, morbidity G3-5, and Ki-67 >5 %. The remaining biological markers were not associated with outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: Ki-67 was found to be a new powerful determinant of outcome. Patients with a Ki-67 labeling index >5 % carry a very poor prognosis and do not benefit from the combined procedure. Further studies should be conducted to confirm the present data.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIDNA-Binding ProteinsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesKi-67 AntigenLung NeoplasmsMaleMesotheliomaMesothelioma, MalignantMiddle AgedMinichromosome Maintenance Complex Component 7Neoplasm StagingPeritoneal NeoplasmsPrognosisSurvival RateTissue Array AnalysisYoung Adult