Chest · 2023
Central and Peripheral Hemodynamics in Young Adults Who Use Water Pipes and the Acute Effects of Water-Pipe Use.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chami Hassan A, Diab Maya, Zaouk Nour, Arnaout Samir, Mitchell Gary F, Isma'eel Hussain, Shihadeh Alan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Tobacco use via water pipe (commonly referred to as water-pipe smoking [WPS]) is popular among young adults globally and exposes those who smoke to toxicants.
RESEARCH QUESTION: Is WPS associated with impaired measures of arterial function and does WPS acutely impair these measures in young adults?
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We assessed heart rate (HR), brachial and aortic BP, HR-adjusted augmentation index (AI), and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (CFPWV) in 62 individuals who use water pipes and 34 individuals who have never used a water pipe recruited from the community (mean age, 22.5 ± 3.0 years; 48% female). Measurements were obtained before and after an outdoor session of WPS among participants who use water pipes and among the control group of participants who have never used a water pipe. Measurements were compared after vs before exposure and between those who use and those who do not use water pipes, adjusting for possible confounders using linear regression.
RESULTS: Participants who use water pipes and control participants had similar demographic characteristics. BP and HR increased acutely after WPS (brachial systolic BP by 4.13 mm Hg [95% CI, 1.91-6.36 mm Hg]; aortic systolic BP by 2.31 mm Hg [95% CI, 0.28-4.33 mm Hg]; brachial diastolic BP by 3.69 mm Hg [95% CI, 1.62-5.77 mm Hg]; aortic diastolic BP by 3.03 mm Hg [95% CI, 0.74-5.33 mm Hg]; and HR by 7.75 beats/min [95% CI, 5.46-10.04 beats/min]), but not in the control group. AI was significantly higher in participants who use water pipes compared with those who do not (9.02% vs 3.06%; P = .03), including after adjusting for BMI and family history of cardiovascular disease (β = 6.12; 95% CI, 0.55-11.69; P = .03) and when assessing habitual tobacco use via water-pipe extent (water pipes used/day × water-pipe use duration) in water-pipe-years (β = 2.51/water-pipe-year; 95% CI, 0.10-4.92/water-pipe-year; P = .04). However, CFPWV was similar in those who use water pipes and those who do not, and AI and CFPWV did not change acutely after WPS.
INTERPRETATION: In apparently healthy young individuals from the community, habitual WPS was associated with increased AI, a predictor of cardiovascular risk, and one WPS session acutely increased HR and brachial and aortic BP.
RESEARCH QUESTION: Is WPS associated with impaired measures of arterial function and does WPS acutely impair these measures in young adults?
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We assessed heart rate (HR), brachial and aortic BP, HR-adjusted augmentation index (AI), and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (CFPWV) in 62 individuals who use water pipes and 34 individuals who have never used a water pipe recruited from the community (mean age, 22.5 ± 3.0 years; 48% female). Measurements were obtained before and after an outdoor session of WPS among participants who use water pipes and among the control group of participants who have never used a water pipe. Measurements were compared after vs before exposure and between those who use and those who do not use water pipes, adjusting for possible confounders using linear regression.
RESULTS: Participants who use water pipes and control participants had similar demographic characteristics. BP and HR increased acutely after WPS (brachial systolic BP by 4.13 mm Hg [95% CI, 1.91-6.36 mm Hg]; aortic systolic BP by 2.31 mm Hg [95% CI, 0.28-4.33 mm Hg]; brachial diastolic BP by 3.69 mm Hg [95% CI, 1.62-5.77 mm Hg]; aortic diastolic BP by 3.03 mm Hg [95% CI, 0.74-5.33 mm Hg]; and HR by 7.75 beats/min [95% CI, 5.46-10.04 beats/min]), but not in the control group. AI was significantly higher in participants who use water pipes compared with those who do not (9.02% vs 3.06%; P = .03), including after adjusting for BMI and family history of cardiovascular disease (β = 6.12; 95% CI, 0.55-11.69; P = .03) and when assessing habitual tobacco use via water-pipe extent (water pipes used/day × water-pipe use duration) in water-pipe-years (β = 2.51/water-pipe-year; 95% CI, 0.10-4.92/water-pipe-year; P = .04). However, CFPWV was similar in those who use water pipes and those who do not, and AI and CFPWV did not change acutely after WPS.
INTERPRETATION: In apparently healthy young individuals from the community, habitual WPS was associated with increased AI, a predictor of cardiovascular risk, and one WPS session acutely increased HR and brachial and aortic BP.