Arthritis research & therapy · 2026
Real-world comparative effectiveness of sarilumab versus Janus kinase inhibitors as monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nozaki Yuji, Kishimoto Kazuya, Itami Tetsu, Tomita Daisuke, Wada Yumiko, Kotani Takuya, Takeuchi Tohru, Hidaka Toshihiko, Hino Shoichi, Miyamoto Toshiaki, Miyake Hirofumi, Hatta Kazunari, Mamoto Kenji, Yamada Yutaro, Okano Tadashi, Okano Takaichi, Saegusa Jun, Horita Masahiro, Nishida Keiichiro, Kinoshita Koji, Rai Shinya
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Sarilumab (SAR), an interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor (IL-6Ri), and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) are approved options for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) when methotrexate (MTX) cannot be used. Real-world evidence for MTX-free monotherapy remains limited.
METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of RA patients receiving SAR or JAKi as MTX-free monotherapy. To reduce confounding, 1:1 propensity score matching was performed in the overall cohort (n = 252, 126 per group) and separately within treatment-line strata: Phase 2 first-line biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs: 45 per group), Phase 3 second-line b/tsDMARDs (53 per group), and Phase 3 ≥ third-line b/tsDMARDs (47 per group). Outcomes over 12 months included drug retention, change in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), glucocorticoid (GC) tapering and discontinuation, low disease activity (LDA, CDAI ≤ 10), and safety profiles. Predictors of LDA were evaluated with logistic regression. This multicenter real-world.
RESULTS: Across matched strata by prior b/tsDMARDs, retention and CDAI change did not differ significantly between SAR and JAKi through 12 months. When classified by cause, adverse events (AEs)-related discontinuation was higher with JAKi, yielding lower AE-specific retention. Both groups demonstrated GC sparing overtime, with a greater increase in GC discontinuation for SAR than for JAKi in Phase 2. Baseline predictors of achieving LDA at 12 months included higher C-reactive protein (CRP) and platelet count (Plt) in both groups, with additional associations of younger age and lower hemoglobin (Hb) in the SAR. In safety analyses, overall AEs were less frequent with SAR than with JAKi, driven by lower risks of infection including herpes zoster, while other categories were similarly infrequent.
CONCLUSION: SAR and JAKi showed no statistically significant differences in 12-month retention or disease control in MTX-free monotherapy settings. Higher CRP and Plt with lower Hb, particularly in younger patients, identified better response to SAR and support biomarker guided selection between IL-6Ri and JAKi. In Phase 2, GC discontinuation with SAR suggests a practical strategy to reduce AEs while maintaining efficacy. Prospective studies should validate these findings and define actionable thresholds.
METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of RA patients receiving SAR or JAKi as MTX-free monotherapy. To reduce confounding, 1:1 propensity score matching was performed in the overall cohort (n = 252, 126 per group) and separately within treatment-line strata: Phase 2 first-line biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs: 45 per group), Phase 3 second-line b/tsDMARDs (53 per group), and Phase 3 ≥ third-line b/tsDMARDs (47 per group). Outcomes over 12 months included drug retention, change in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), glucocorticoid (GC) tapering and discontinuation, low disease activity (LDA, CDAI ≤ 10), and safety profiles. Predictors of LDA were evaluated with logistic regression. This multicenter real-world.
RESULTS: Across matched strata by prior b/tsDMARDs, retention and CDAI change did not differ significantly between SAR and JAKi through 12 months. When classified by cause, adverse events (AEs)-related discontinuation was higher with JAKi, yielding lower AE-specific retention. Both groups demonstrated GC sparing overtime, with a greater increase in GC discontinuation for SAR than for JAKi in Phase 2. Baseline predictors of achieving LDA at 12 months included higher C-reactive protein (CRP) and platelet count (Plt) in both groups, with additional associations of younger age and lower hemoglobin (Hb) in the SAR. In safety analyses, overall AEs were less frequent with SAR than with JAKi, driven by lower risks of infection including herpes zoster, while other categories were similarly infrequent.
CONCLUSION: SAR and JAKi showed no statistically significant differences in 12-month retention or disease control in MTX-free monotherapy settings. Higher CRP and Plt with lower Hb, particularly in younger patients, identified better response to SAR and support biomarker guided selection between IL-6Ri and JAKi. In Phase 2, GC discontinuation with SAR suggests a practical strategy to reduce AEs while maintaining efficacy. Prospective studies should validate these findings and define actionable thresholds.