MedElevator
Войти в исследования Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Anifrolumab in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Randomized, Phase 3 Study.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеКлиническое исследование III фазыМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Manzi Susan, Bruce Ian N, Morand Eric F, Furie Richard, Tanaka Yoshiya, Kalunian Kenneth C, Askanase Anca, Puzio Patricia, Khan Emon, Wissmar Jenny, Song Michael, Lindholm Catharina, TULIP‐SC investigators
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The multinational, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled TULIP-SC trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous anifrolumab in adults who have moderate to severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) activity, despite receiving standard therapy.
METHODS: Adults with SLE received subcutaneous anifrolumab 120 mg or placebo once weekly for 52 weeks (1:1 randomization). Only the primary endpoint (treatment difference in BILAG-based Composite Lupus Assessment [BICLA] response at 52 weeks) was formally tested in a preplanned interim analysis; key secondary and other endpoints were tested in the full analysis.
RESULTS: At the interim analysis (220 patients, anifrolumab: n = 109; placebo: n = 111), the primary endpoint was met (anifrolumab vs placebo: 59.4% vs 43.9%; BICLA response difference 15.5%, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.3-28.6; P = 0.0211). The full analysis included 367 patients (anifrolumab: n = 184; placebo: n = 183). Versus placebo, more patients treated with anifrolumab attained a BICLA response while maintaining low/reduced oral glucocorticoid doses through week 52 (56.2% vs 34.0%; difference 22.3%, 95% CI 12.3-32.2; P < 0.0001), and the time to first sustained BICLA response was reduced (hazard ratio 2.2, 95% CI 1.5-3.2; P < 0.0001). Treatment differences in week 52 DORIS remission and Low Lupus Disease Activity State attainment rates favored anifrolumab over placebo (14.2%, 95% CI 5.6-22.8; P = 0.0012, and 14.1%, 95% CI 4.6-23.6; P = 0.0038). The frequencies of serious adverse events were 11.9% with anifrolumab and 10.4% with placebo; the frequencies of herpes zoster were 3.8% and 1.1%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Consistent with the well-established profile of intravenous anifrolumab, subcutaneous anifrolumab demonstrated significant, clinically meaningful treatment benefits when added to standard therapy, and an acceptable safety profile in patients with moderate to severe SLE.
METHODS: Adults with SLE received subcutaneous anifrolumab 120 mg or placebo once weekly for 52 weeks (1:1 randomization). Only the primary endpoint (treatment difference in BILAG-based Composite Lupus Assessment [BICLA] response at 52 weeks) was formally tested in a preplanned interim analysis; key secondary and other endpoints were tested in the full analysis.
RESULTS: At the interim analysis (220 patients, anifrolumab: n = 109; placebo: n = 111), the primary endpoint was met (anifrolumab vs placebo: 59.4% vs 43.9%; BICLA response difference 15.5%, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.3-28.6; P = 0.0211). The full analysis included 367 patients (anifrolumab: n = 184; placebo: n = 183). Versus placebo, more patients treated with anifrolumab attained a BICLA response while maintaining low/reduced oral glucocorticoid doses through week 52 (56.2% vs 34.0%; difference 22.3%, 95% CI 12.3-32.2; P < 0.0001), and the time to first sustained BICLA response was reduced (hazard ratio 2.2, 95% CI 1.5-3.2; P < 0.0001). Treatment differences in week 52 DORIS remission and Low Lupus Disease Activity State attainment rates favored anifrolumab over placebo (14.2%, 95% CI 5.6-22.8; P = 0.0012, and 14.1%, 95% CI 4.6-23.6; P = 0.0038). The frequencies of serious adverse events were 11.9% with anifrolumab and 10.4% with placebo; the frequencies of herpes zoster were 3.8% and 1.1%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Consistent with the well-established profile of intravenous anifrolumab, subcutaneous anifrolumab demonstrated significant, clinically meaningful treatment benefits when added to standard therapy, and an acceptable safety profile in patients with moderate to severe SLE.