European addiction research · 2025
Glucose Intake Reduces Craving in Patients with Alcohol Use Disorder Depending on Insulin Response.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wetzel Lea, Hoffmann Sabine, Reinhard Iris, Riegler Alisa, Pourbaix Madeleine, Ardern Isabel, Link Tobias, Vollstädt-Klein Sabine, Lenz Bernd, Kiefer Falk, Koopmann Anne, Bach Patrick
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: There is evidence that the appetite-regulating hormone insulin plays an important role in alcohol use disorder (AUD), in the sense that there is a negative correlation between insulin and alcohol craving, meaning that an increase in insulin levels leads to a reduction in acute craving. This suggests a promising approach for the acute reduction of craving in the treatment of patients with AUD, which could be achieved via an actively induced short-term increase in insulin levels, e.g., by glucose administration, and which has not yet been investigated in the form of a randomized controlled trial. Another aspect that has not yet been investigated is the role of the insulin-responder-type of each individual, i.e., the time until the insulin peak is reached, in this relationship.
METHODS: The randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study examined a glucose intake as acute treatment to reduce craving in 80 male and female patients with AUD. Dynamics in craving and insulin levels were assessed at 8 time points on each study visit before and after alcohol cue exposure, after treatment with glucose-respective placebo solution and during the subsequent observation phase. These changes were analyzed using linear mixed models. The insulin-responder-type (fast, normal, slow) of each person was taken into account, and possible interactions with the treatment were analyzed.
RESULTS: Linear mixed models revealed a significant interaction effect (F(2, 412.058) = 7.988, p < 0.001) between treatment and insulin-responder-type on craving, with lower craving values in the glucose compared to the placebo condition in the normal insulin-responder-type group (i.e., insulin peak after glucose intake within 30 to 60 min, difference in means = -0.805, p = 0.003, 95% CI: -1.428, -0.182). In the contrary, in the fast insulin-responder-type group craving values were higher in the glucose compared to the placebo condition (difference in means = 1.143, p = 0.011, 95% CI: 0.378, 1.907). Slow insulin-responders showed no differences in craving levels depending on the treatment condition (difference in means = -0.124, p = 0.694, 95% CI: -0.741, 0.493). No main effect was found in the linear mixed models for baseline-centered insulin levels (F(1, 395.337) = 2.328, p = 0.128).
CONCLUSIONS: Glucose intake may reduce craving in individuals with AUD who show a normal insulin response. Further research should consider the different insulin-responder-types and peak times to better understand the underlying mechanisms of craving reduction with glucose administration in the context of insulin elevation.
METHODS: The randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study examined a glucose intake as acute treatment to reduce craving in 80 male and female patients with AUD. Dynamics in craving and insulin levels were assessed at 8 time points on each study visit before and after alcohol cue exposure, after treatment with glucose-respective placebo solution and during the subsequent observation phase. These changes were analyzed using linear mixed models. The insulin-responder-type (fast, normal, slow) of each person was taken into account, and possible interactions with the treatment were analyzed.
RESULTS: Linear mixed models revealed a significant interaction effect (F(2, 412.058) = 7.988, p < 0.001) between treatment and insulin-responder-type on craving, with lower craving values in the glucose compared to the placebo condition in the normal insulin-responder-type group (i.e., insulin peak after glucose intake within 30 to 60 min, difference in means = -0.805, p = 0.003, 95% CI: -1.428, -0.182). In the contrary, in the fast insulin-responder-type group craving values were higher in the glucose compared to the placebo condition (difference in means = 1.143, p = 0.011, 95% CI: 0.378, 1.907). Slow insulin-responders showed no differences in craving levels depending on the treatment condition (difference in means = -0.124, p = 0.694, 95% CI: -0.741, 0.493). No main effect was found in the linear mixed models for baseline-centered insulin levels (F(1, 395.337) = 2.328, p = 0.128).
CONCLUSIONS: Glucose intake may reduce craving in individuals with AUD who show a normal insulin response. Further research should consider the different insulin-responder-types and peak times to better understand the underlying mechanisms of craving reduction with glucose administration in the context of insulin elevation.