The utility of alcohol saliva test strips compared to the breathalyzer in trauma patients in a resource-limited setting.

INTRODUCTION

The correlation between alcohol consumption and injury is undeniable. However, past research relying on self-reporting alcohol use likely resulted in underreporting and emphasizing the need to increase alcohol testing, especially in resource-limited settings where the burden of injuries is highest.

METHODS

This is a prospective analysis of injured patients presenting to the trauma center at Kamuzu Central Hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi. We collected information including patient age, sex, admission date, mechanism of injury, breathalyzer test and Rapid ResponseTM Alcohol Saliva Test Strips (AST) result, and survival.

RESULTS

A total of 805 trauma patients were included. The overall prevalence of alcohol consumption in this trauma cohort is 18.3%. There was a 95.5% agreement between the AST and breathalyzer test with a Kappa coefficient of 0.83. The sensitivity and specificity of the AST were determined to be 78.5% (CI 75.7-81.2) and 99.3% (CI 98.7-99.9), respectively. ROC analyses showed the AST to have excellent discrimination with an area under the curve of 0.88 (95% CI 0.85-0.92).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of alcohol-related injury is high in Malawi and the use of the Alcohol Saliva Test Strips is feasible and correlated with results derived from the breathalyzer. Routine alcohol testing for trauma patients presenting to a resource-limited setting is imperative and should be implemented.