MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085933

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ open · 2024

Assessing the effectiveness of "BETTER Women", a community-based, primary care-linked peer health coaching programme for chronic disease prevention: protocol for a pragmatic, wait-list controlled, type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.

Kithulegoda Natasha, Williams Camille, Senthilmurugan Aranee, Aimola Sabrina, Atkinson John, Banerjee Ananya Tina, Bazeghi Farnaz, Bender Jacqueline L, Flynn Susan, Ghatage Lena, Goulbourne Elaine, Grunfeld Eva, Heisey Ruth, Rao Anjana, Sutcliffe Kaylyn, Lofters Aisha, Ivers Noah M

СтатьяПротокол клинического исследованияПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

The Building on Existing Tools to Improve Cancer and Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening in Primary Care (BETTER) programme trains allied health professionals working in primary care settings to develop personalised chronic disease 'prevention prescriptions' with patients. However, maintenance of health behaviour changes is difficult without ongoing support. Sustainable options to enhance the BETTER programme and ensure accessibility to underserved populations are needed. We designed the BETTER Women programme, which uses a digital app to match patients with a trained peer health coach (PHC) who provides ongoing support for health behaviour change after receipt of a BETTER prevention prescription in primary care.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a type 1 hybrid implementation-effectiveness patient-randomised trial. Interested women aged 40-68 years will be recruited from three large, sociodemographically distinct primary care clinics (urban, suburban and rural). Patients will be randomised 1:1 to intervention or wait-list control after receipt of their BETTER prevention prescription. We will aim to recruit 204 patients per group (408 total). Effectiveness will be assessed by the primary outcome of targeted behaviours achieved for each participant at 6 months, consisting of three cancer screening tests (cervical, breast and colorectal) and four behavioural determinants of cancer and chronic disease (diet, smoking, alcohol use and physical activity). Data will be collected through patient survey and clinical chart review, measured at 3, 6 and 12 months. Implementation outcomes will be assessed through patient surveys and interviews with patients, peer health coaches and healthcare providers. An embedded economic evaluation will examine cost per quality-adjusted life-year and per additional health behavioural targets achieved.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by Women's College Hospital Research Ethics Board (REB), the Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre REB and the University of Toronto REB. All participants will provide informed consent prior to enrolment. Participation is voluntary and withdrawal will have no impact on the usual care received from their primary care provider. The results of this trial will be published in peer-reviewed journals and shared via conference presentations. Deidentified datasets will be shared on request, after publication of results.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04746859.

Для цитирования: Kithulegoda Natasha, Williams Camille, Senthilmurugan Aranee, Aimola Sabrina, Atkinson John, Banerjee Ananya Tina, Bazeghi Farnaz, Bender Jacqueline L, Flynn Susan, Ghatage Lena, Goulbourne Elaine, Grunfeld Eva, Heisey Ruth, Rao Anjana, Sutcliffe Kaylyn, Lofters Aisha, Ivers Noah M. Assessing the effectiveness of "BETTER Women", a community-based, primary care-linked peer health coaching programme for chronic disease prevention: protocol for a pragmatic, wait-list controlled, type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.. BMJ open. 2024. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085933.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.