MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11910-017-0763-9

Медицинская библиотека · Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2017

Comparing the Intracarotid Amobarbital Test and Functional MRI for the Presurgical Evaluation of Language in Epilepsy.

Massot-Tarrús Andreu, Mousavi Seyed Reza, Mirsattari Seyed M

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМетаанализОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Surgery is the treatment of choice for drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). However, such surgery frequently causes deficits in language function, especially if performed on the dominant hemisphere. In recent years, the intracarotid amobarbital test (IAT) has been gradually replaced by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in the preoperative identification of language areas to estimate the risk of postoperative language decline. In this paper, we review the neural substrates for language processing, how language impairment can result both from TLE itself and from surgical attempts to treat it. Subsequently, we discuss the strengths and limitations of, and current indications for fMRI and IAT during the preoperative workup, both by discussion of the studies that have evaluated them individually and through meta-analysis of data from 31 studies deemed eligible for analysis. Electrocortical stimulation mapping (ESM) is also discussed, as is the usefulness of the novel technique of resting-state fMRI. Finally, surgical techniques designed to avoid or reduce language decline in patients at risk are explored.

Для цитирования: Massot-Tarrús Andreu, Mousavi Seyed Reza, Mirsattari Seyed M. Comparing the Intracarotid Amobarbital Test and Functional MRI for the Presurgical Evaluation of Language in Epilepsy.. Current neurology and neuroscience reports. 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s11910-017-0763-9.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.