MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/mcc.0b013e3283374e3c

Медицинская библиотека · Current opinion in critical care · 2010

Therapeutic drug monitoring in the neurocritical care unit.

Loh Gabriel W, Mabasa Vincent H, Ensom Mary H H

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Various antiepileptics, sedative and anesthetic agents are used in the neurocritical care setting and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been proposed as a means to individualize dosing to ensure efficacy, avoid toxicity, and to account for drug-drug interactions. The purpose of this review is to highlight key articles relating to TDM published in the last 5 years with a focus on drug therapy for seizures, status epilepticus, and traumatic brain injury.

RECENT FINDINGS: Current evidence supports TDM of first-generation antiepileptics, and free-level monitoring for phenytoin and valproic acid is recommended in the neurocritical care population. There are insufficient data to recommend routine TDM of second-generation antiepileptics at this time. In traumatic brain injury, routine TDM of barbiturate infusions appears to be of little value in guiding or evaluating patient response to therapy except to differentiate between drug-induced coma and brain death. Although TDM of sedative agents has been studied, the use of clinical sedation scales is preferred over TDM in evaluating a patient's level of sedation.

SUMMARY: Therapeutic drug monitoring plays an important role in the care of patients in the neurocritical care setting but is applicable only to a limited number of drugs.

Для цитирования: Loh Gabriel W, Mabasa Vincent H, Ensom Mary H H. Therapeutic drug monitoring in the neurocritical care unit.. Current opinion in critical care. 2010. DOI: 10.1097/mcc.0b013e3283374e3c.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.