Characteristics and outcomes of ocular candidiasis among patients who use buprenorphine intravenously.
Аннотация
We evaluated the characteristics and outcomes of ocular candidiasis in patients using buprenorphine intravenously. A retrospective analysis of 35 eyes of people who use drugs diagnosed with presumed ocular candidiasis between 2000 and 2017 was performed. Data on demographics, ocular findings, and microbiological results were extracted from medical records. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors of poor visual prognosis, then multivariate analysis used the variables that were statistically significant in univariate analysis. Most patients (83%) were male, with a mean duration of 7.1 ± 7.3 years from the onset of intravenous use of buprenorphine to diagnosis of ocular candidiasis. The mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA in logMAR) at diagnosis was 1.33 ± 0.73, improving significantly to 0.94 ± 0.91 at the last follow-up (P = .019). Diagnostic samples included aqueous humor from all patients and vitrectomy samples from 26 patients (74%), with positivity rates for Candida species culture of 23% and 27%, respectively. Extraocular sites tested positive for Candida in 54% of cases. Although representing 66% of identifications, Candida albicans was not the only identified organism. Treatment involved primarily fluconazole (91%) and intravitreal amphotericin B (69%). Poor visual outcomes correlated with low BCVA and presence of retinal detachment at baseline. Ocular candidiasis occurs in the context of chronic drug use. Diagnostic yield from ocular samples is relatively low, necessitating the investigation of extraocular infection sites or injection equipment. Poor baseline vision and retinal detachment were significant predictors of poor visual prognosis.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.