Journal of science and medicine in sport · 2025
Implicit doping attitude and athletes' accuracy in avoiding unintentional doping when being offered beverages with banned performance-enhancing substances.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chan Derwin King Chung, Yip Lawrence Man Ho, Tang Tracy Chor Wai, Yung Patrick Shu-Hang, Gucciardi Daniel F, Hagger Martin S
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Implicit doping attitude reflects the strength of one's automatic or unconscious evaluation of doping. This cross-societal study examined how implicit doping attitude predicted athletes' accuracy in avoiding unintentional doping.
DESIGN: A real-time experimental design with cross-sectional data from three geographical regions.
METHODS: A total of 681 athletes (Mage = 28.21, SD = 8.43; female = 47.1 %) from Hong Kong (N = 177), Australia (N = 164) and the United Kingdom (N = 340) completed two real-time experimental tasks for measuring their implicit doping attitude (a brief single-category implicit association test) and the accuracy of avoiding unintentional doping (a novel canned beverage sorting task).
RESULTS: Implicit doping attitude was significantly and negatively (β = -0.09, p < .05, R2 = 0.03, 95 % CI of β = -1.64 to -0.15) associated with athletes' accuracy in avoiding unintentional doping by screening out beverages with banned performance-enhancing substances. This association was maintained when we statistically controlled for the effects of society.
CONCLUSIONS: Athletes with a positive implicit doping attitude were less accurate in determining whether unknown beverages with the possible presence of banned performance-enhancing substances should be consumed. The negative association between implicit doping and athletes' accuracy in avoiding unintentional doping appeared to be consistent across societies.
DESIGN: A real-time experimental design with cross-sectional data from three geographical regions.
METHODS: A total of 681 athletes (Mage = 28.21, SD = 8.43; female = 47.1 %) from Hong Kong (N = 177), Australia (N = 164) and the United Kingdom (N = 340) completed two real-time experimental tasks for measuring their implicit doping attitude (a brief single-category implicit association test) and the accuracy of avoiding unintentional doping (a novel canned beverage sorting task).
RESULTS: Implicit doping attitude was significantly and negatively (β = -0.09, p < .05, R2 = 0.03, 95 % CI of β = -1.64 to -0.15) associated with athletes' accuracy in avoiding unintentional doping by screening out beverages with banned performance-enhancing substances. This association was maintained when we statistically controlled for the effects of society.
CONCLUSIONS: Athletes with a positive implicit doping attitude were less accurate in determining whether unknown beverages with the possible presence of banned performance-enhancing substances should be consumed. The negative association between implicit doping and athletes' accuracy in avoiding unintentional doping appeared to be consistent across societies.