MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/yct.0b013e318070d1e9

Медицинская библиотека · The journal of ECT · 2007

A comparison of propofol and thiopentone use in electroconvulsive therapy: cognitive and efficacy effects.

Ingram Anna, Schweitzer Isaac, Ng Chee H, Saling Michael M, Savage Greg

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare thiopentone and propofol administration for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in terms of associated efficacy and cognitive side effects in the immediate and medium term.

METHOD: Participants comprised 30 depressed patients who were administered either propofol or thiopentone as an anesthetic agent for ECT. Clinical rating scales and a battery of neuropsychological tests were administered at baseline, after 6 treatments, 1 to 3 days after treatment end point, and at 1-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Thiopentone administration was associated with advantages in efficacy and cognitive side effects compared with propofol administration.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reports some serendipitous findings regarding the comparative effects of the anesthetic agents, propofol and thiopentone. Although limited by small sample size, results suggest that thiopentone has advantages for use as an anesthetic agent with ECT compared with propofol. It also highlights the need for further investigation of the impact of anesthetic agents on the cognitive side effects and efficacy of ECT.

Для цитирования: Ingram Anna, Schweitzer Isaac, Ng Chee H, Saling Michael M, Savage Greg. A comparison of propofol and thiopentone use in electroconvulsive therapy: cognitive and efficacy effects.. The journal of ECT. 2007. DOI: 10.1097/yct.0b013e318070d1e9.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.