MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/01.yct.0000244238.17791.a4

Медицинская библиотека · The journal of ECT · 2006

A retrospective comparison of anesthetic agents in electroconvulsive therapy.

Swaim Jennifer C, Mansour Maher, Wydo Salina M, Moore Jeffrey L

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A recent lack of availability of the anesthetic agent methohexital in the United States allowed for a naturalistic study of the efficacy and the adverse effects of alternatives. Methohexital, propofol, and thiopental were compared as anesthetic agents for electroconvulsive therapy in 95 patients treated during a 23-month period in a general public hospital. Missed seizures and arrhythmias were infrequently observed (<4% for any agent). Methohexital was found significantly related to longer seizure durations in comparison with both other agents (P < 0.01). The use of propofol was associated with increased risk of missed seizure (8.9%) compared with methohexital (3.9%) and thiopental (3.2%). Propofol was also associated with higher doses of administered energy, with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.018) observed between propofol and thiopental. Although propofol required the greatest energy delivery, it was associated with the shortest seizure durations. Methohexital resulted in the longest seizure duration, and thiopental was associated with the least amount of energy delivery with an intermediate seizure length.

Для цитирования: Swaim Jennifer C, Mansour Maher, Wydo Salina M, Moore Jeffrey L. A retrospective comparison of anesthetic agents in electroconvulsive therapy.. The journal of ECT. 2006. DOI: 10.1097/01.yct.0000244238.17791.a4.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.