Comparing the performance of conventional PCR, RTQ-PCR, and droplet digital PCR assays in detection of Shigella.

The incidence of foodborne infections caused by Shigella spp. is still very high in every year, which poses a great potential threat to public health. Conventional quantification methods based on culture techniques, biochemical, and serological identification are time-consuming and labor-intensive. To develop a more rapid and efficient detection method of Shigella spp., we compared the sensitivity and specificity of three different polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods, including conventional PCR, quantitative real-time PCR (RTQ-PCR), and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). Our results indicated that ddPCR method exhibited higher sensitivity, and the limit of detection was 10-5 ng/μl for genomic DNA templates, 10-1 cfu/ml for Shigella bacteria culture. In addition, we found that ddPCR was a time-saving method, which required a shorter pre-culturing time. Collectively, ddPCR assay was a reliable method for rapid and effective detection of Shigella spp.