Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2021
Epilepsy & gambling: Risk factors for problem gambling behaviors in people with epilepsy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Heaney Dominic, Baxendale Sallie
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Problem gambling results from the complex interaction of neurological factors with psychological, demographic, and socioeconomical influences. The vulnerabilities of people with epilepsy to many of these influences may increase their susceptibility to developing problematic gambling behaviors. The aim of this study was to establish the frequency of gambling participation and the clinical correlates of problem gambling behaviors in people with epilepsy.
METHODS: Lifestyle questions, including the Lie/Bet screening questionnaire were administered to 250 consecutive attendees at a neurology clinic. Valid data were available for 174 adults with epilepsy and 65 adults with other neurological conditions.
RESULTS: With the exception of people with frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE), gambling participation rates in people with epilepsy and those with other neurological conditions were lower than those reported in the general population. While the overall levels of gambling participation were relatively low in this sample, the number of gamblers who responded positively to the lie/bet questionnaire was ten times higher than that seen in the general population, with one in three gamblers in our series reporting signs of escalation. All had epilepsy and were more likely to be taking Levetiracetam or Brivaracetam than the other gamblers in our series. While epilepsy classification was not related to gambling escalation, patients with FLE were overrepresented in this group due to their significantly higher baseline levels of participation in gambling.
CONCLUSIONS: People with FLE may have a heightened vulnerability to developing problem gambling behaviors. The role of the neurological consultation in managing these risks is discussed.
METHODS: Lifestyle questions, including the Lie/Bet screening questionnaire were administered to 250 consecutive attendees at a neurology clinic. Valid data were available for 174 adults with epilepsy and 65 adults with other neurological conditions.
RESULTS: With the exception of people with frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE), gambling participation rates in people with epilepsy and those with other neurological conditions were lower than those reported in the general population. While the overall levels of gambling participation were relatively low in this sample, the number of gamblers who responded positively to the lie/bet questionnaire was ten times higher than that seen in the general population, with one in three gamblers in our series reporting signs of escalation. All had epilepsy and were more likely to be taking Levetiracetam or Brivaracetam than the other gamblers in our series. While epilepsy classification was not related to gambling escalation, patients with FLE were overrepresented in this group due to their significantly higher baseline levels of participation in gambling.
CONCLUSIONS: People with FLE may have a heightened vulnerability to developing problem gambling behaviors. The role of the neurological consultation in managing these risks is discussed.