MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7705/biomedica.5085

Медицинская библиотека · Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2020

Importance of clinical and laboratory characteristics in the diagnosis of dengue and chikungunya co-infection: Probable case report.

Restrepo Berta Nelly, Arboleda Margarita, Marín Katerine, Romero Paola, Muñoz Ana Luisa, Bosch Irene

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We report the case of a 38-year-old woman who initially consulted for an undifferentiated fever. Although her clinical condition evolved with signs and symptoms compatible with dengue with alarm signs and that the anti-dengue IgM detection in a single sample indicated it was a probable case that could have happened during the previous three months, the patient kept consulting due to little improvement. On the tenth day after the onset of symptoms, she presented with painful polyarticular symmetric edema, as well as hyperpigmented lesions in the nasolabial fold. Chikungunya diagnosis was confirmed by the presence of IgM antibodies. In endemic countries for dengue and chikungunya, the possibility of co-infection exists, but it may go unnoticed. On the other hand, the co-infection may worsen the clinical course of these diseases. Therefore, physicians should evaluate the clinical and laboratory characteristics of both infections to be able to diagnose the coinfection for adequate management and to minimize complications.

Для цитирования: Restrepo Berta Nelly, Arboleda Margarita, Marín Katerine, Romero Paola, Muñoz Ana Luisa, Bosch Irene. Importance of clinical and laboratory characteristics in the diagnosis of dengue and chikungunya co-infection: Probable case report.. Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud. 2020. DOI: 10.7705/biomedica.5085.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.